Tools & Wizards About Us
garff.im screenshot

Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

garff.im

Home

Page Load Speed

39.7 sec in total

First Response

9.5 sec

Resources Loaded

29.8 sec

Page Rendered

386 ms

garff.im screenshot

About Website

Welcome to garff.im homepage info - get ready to check Garff best content right away, or after learning these important things about garff.im

Visit garff.im

Key Findings

We analyzed Garff.im page load time and found that the first response time was 9.5 sec and then it took 30.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

garff.im performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,870 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.399

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

garff.im

9487 ms

www.garff.im

2473 ms

style.min.css

1255 ms

extendify-utilities.css

1259 ms

style.css

1350 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Garff.im, 23% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Garff.im.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 78.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Garff.im main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 689.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 54.2 kB

  • Original 66.6 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 49 B

  • Original 689.8 kB
  • After minification 689.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Garff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 19.3 kB

  • Original 332.4 kB
  • After minification 332.4 kB
  • After compression 313.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 95.8 kB
  • After minification 95.4 kB
  • After compression 91.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Garff.im has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (73%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Garff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

garff.im

garff.im

9487 ms

www.garff.im

www.garff.im

2473 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1255 ms

extendify-utilities.css

extendify-utilities.css

1259 ms

style.css

style.css

1350 ms

style.css

style.css

1265 ms

customskin.css

customskin.css

1270 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

1454 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2445 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

2362 ms

js

js

70 ms

index.js

index.js

2363 ms

index.js

index.js

2367 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

2621 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

2654 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

3535 ms

third-party.js

third-party.js

3626 ms

library.min.js

library.min.js

3541 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

3591 ms

api.js

api.js

56 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

3592 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

3597 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

5354 ms

index.js

index.js

5362 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

5367 ms

css

css

39 ms

logo-400.gif

logo-400.gif

2962 ms

laxey-guide.png

laxey-guide.png

3006 ms

1-laxey-wheel-250.jpg

1-laxey-wheel-250.jpg

3004 ms

laxey-weather-1.jpg

laxey-weather-1.jpg

5042 ms

maptransback-424x480.png

maptransback-424x480.png

5042 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

72 ms

315740659_508560964646725_7431353015941228205_n-1.jpg

315740659_508560964646725_7431353015941228205_n-1.jpg

5363 ms

background2-invert-1.jpg

background2-invert-1.jpg

5353 ms

6xK1dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZ7nsDc.ttf

6xK1dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZ7nsDc.ttf

42 ms

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZMkids18E.ttf

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZMkids18E.ttf

42 ms

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZYokSds18E.ttf

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZYokSds18E.ttf

77 ms

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZY4lCds18E.ttf

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZY4lCds18E.ttf

92 ms

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZclSds18E.ttf

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZclSds18E.ttf

92 ms

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZklyds18E.ttf

6xKwdSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qPZZklyds18E.ttf

92 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf

92 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf

91 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf

91 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf

109 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

109 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf

109 ms

townpress.ttf

townpress.ttf

5046 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

5265 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

19 ms

js

js

95 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

89 ms

collect

collect

47 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

Accessibility Review

garff.im accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

garff.im best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

garff.im SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Garff.im can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Garff.im main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

garff.im

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Garff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: