Tools & Wizards About Us
gastrofbg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

gastrofbg.com

Gastroenterology Associates of Fredericksburg: Gastroenterology: Fredericksburg, VA & Stafford, VA

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

536 ms

Page Rendered

457 ms

gastrofbg.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gastrofbg.com now to see the best up-to-date Gastrofbg content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gastrofbg.com

Trusted Gastroenterology serving Fredericksburg, VA & Stafford, VA. Visit our website to book an appointment online: Gastroenterology Associates of Fredericksburg

Visit gastrofbg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gastrofbg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 993 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gastrofbg.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gastrofbg.com

66 ms

gastrofbg.com

32 ms

www.gastrofbg.com

37 ms

practice.atomic.application.scss

108 ms

2464470.png

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Gastrofbg.com, 24% (4 requests) were made to Sa1s3optim.patientpop.com and 24% (4 requests) were made to Sa1s3.patientpop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (267 ms) belongs to the original domain Gastrofbg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

393.7 kB

After Optimization

271.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Gastrofbg.com main page is 393.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 284.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 108.7 kB
  • After minification 90.6 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 284.5 kB
  • After minification 253.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gastrofbg needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 59 B

  • Original 531 B
  • After minification 531 B
  • After compression 472 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59 B or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gastrofbg. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

gastrofbg.com

gastrofbg.com

66 ms

gastrofbg.com

gastrofbg.com

32 ms

www.gastrofbg.com

www.gastrofbg.com

37 ms

practice.atomic.application.scss

practice.atomic.application.scss

108 ms

2464470.png

2464470.png

21 ms

practice.application.js

practice.application.js

125 ms

iframeResizer.min.js

iframeResizer.min.js

267 ms

2464467.jpg

2464467.jpg

8 ms

347771.jpg

347771.jpg

182 ms

346417.jpg

346417.jpg

182 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

46 ms

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff

57 ms

QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBTG_owQUHpNX9rkRdZ1lhPA.woff

QoPu455RxV2raYSIFXAMBTG_owQUHpNX9rkRdZ1lhPA.woff

58 ms

pp-font-awesome-atomic-subset.woff

pp-font-awesome-atomic-subset.woff

46 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

57 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

58 ms

aem.js

aem.js

76 ms

Accessibility Review

gastrofbg.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

gastrofbg.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gastrofbg.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gastrofbg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gastrofbg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gastrofbg.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gastrofbg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: