Tools & Wizards About Us
gateentry.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

gateentry.net

Barrier Gates, Custom Fabrication - Gate Entry Solutions

Page Load Speed

871 ms in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

453 ms

Page Rendered

239 ms

gateentry.net screenshot

About Website

Visit gateentry.net now to see the best up-to-date Gate Entry content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gateentry.net

Gate Entry Solutions offers a wide variety of services such as custom gate fabrication, RFID chips, phone units, transmitters and transponders.

Visit gateentry.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Gateentry.net page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 692 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gateentry.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.151

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gateentry.net

179 ms

analytics.js

27 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

23 ms

style.css

36 ms

css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Gateentry.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (179 ms) belongs to the original domain Gateentry.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gateentry.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 983.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 26.9 kB

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 34.3 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 19.6 kB

  • Original 983.0 kB
  • After minification 963.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gate Entry images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 270.2 kB
  • After minification 270.2 kB
  • After compression 260.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 51.6 kB
  • After minification 51.6 kB
  • After compression 45.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gateentry.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (65%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gate Entry. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gateentry.net

gateentry.net

179 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

27 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

23 ms

style.css

style.css

36 ms

css

css

23 ms

css

css

43 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

24 ms

component.css

component.css

24 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

25 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

26 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

38 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

39 ms

style-custom.css

style-custom.css

40 ms

masterslider.main.css

masterslider.main.css

42 ms

custom.css

custom.css

45 ms

gateentry.net

gateentry.net

84 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

45 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

59 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

47 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

53 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

59 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

58 ms

jquery.dlmenu.js

jquery.dlmenu.js

59 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

60 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

68 ms

jquery.fancybox-media.js

jquery.fancybox-media.js

65 ms

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js

68 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

67 ms

gdlr-script.js

gdlr-script.js

74 ms

js

js

43 ms

maps.js

maps.js

75 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

76 ms

masterslider.min.js

masterslider.min.js

81 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

9 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

js

js

179 ms

css

css

68 ms

Palm-Wallpaper-LR.jpg

Palm-Wallpaper-LR.jpg

33 ms

Gate-Entry-Logo.png

Gate-Entry-Logo.png

15 ms

magnifier-dark.png

magnifier-dark.png

13 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

14 ms

gate-arm-night-LR.jpg

gate-arm-night-LR.jpg

19 ms

IMG_7552-Slide-LR.jpg

IMG_7552-Slide-LR.jpg

25 ms

SWING-GATES-AND-BARRIER-GATES-1-Swing-LR2.jpg

SWING-GATES-AND-BARRIER-GATES-1-Swing-LR2.jpg

39 ms

GateEntry-Yearly-Service-LR.jpg

GateEntry-Yearly-Service-LR.jpg

34 ms

liftmaster_log-LR.jpg

liftmaster_log-LR.jpg

32 ms

LIFTMASTER-RED-LED-GATEARMS-.jpg

LIFTMASTER-RED-LED-GATEARMS-.jpg

25 ms

loading-2.gif

loading-2.gif

31 ms

master-slider-right.png

master-slider-right.png

32 ms

master-slider-left.png

master-slider-left.png

33 ms

LED-Carousel-Vingette-LR2.jpg

LED-Carousel-Vingette-LR2.jpg

47 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

41 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

8 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

13 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

22 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

24 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

22 ms

Accessibility Review

gateentry.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gateentry.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gateentry.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gateentry.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gateentry.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gateentry.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gate Entry. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: