2.9 sec in total
9 ms
2.6 sec
359 ms
Click here to check amazing Gateway content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gateway.org
Am I Pregnant?If you missed your period and have been sexually active, then a pregnancy test is recommended. Contact us today for a free appointment and pregnancy test. Pregnancy OptionsMaking the be...
Visit gateway.orgWe analyzed Gateway.org page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gateway.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value1,160 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value14.1 s
9/100
10%
9 ms
1054 ms
11 ms
84 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Gateway.org, 12% (6 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts-api.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gateway.org.
Page size can be reduced by 164.1 kB (19%)
878.1 kB
714.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Gateway.org main page is 878.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 561.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 131.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.1 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gateway images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gateway.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (74%)
42
11
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gateway. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gateway.org
9 ms
gateway.org
1054 ms
webfont.js
11 ms
84 ms
dashicons.min.css
65 ms
css
170 ms
66 ms
index.min.js
64 ms
jquery.min.js
77 ms
80 ms
react.min.js
147 ms
react-dom.min.js
147 ms
bilmur.min.js
150 ms
146 ms
css
152 ms
148 ms
index.min.js
151 ms
149 ms
index.min.js
150 ms
156 ms
underscore.min.js
150 ms
165 ms
e-202410.js
146 ms
158 ms
element.js
312 ms
152 ms
frontend.min.js
152 ms
wp-util.min.js
151 ms
frontend.min.js
156 ms
153 ms
punycode.min.js
152 ms
utils.min.js
157 ms
wpforms.min.js
155 ms
css
160 ms
pexels-photo-4321069.jpeg
113 ms
cropped-cropped-cropped-cropped-cropped-final-logo-2.png
238 ms
see-baby-grow-2.mp4
634 ms
zita-loader.gif
128 ms
remove-header
858 ms
istock-1178376528.jpg
230 ms
pexels-photo-1239288.jpeg
176 ms
Abortion-Pills.jpg
153 ms
pexels-photo-2591431.jpeg
155 ms
1d0b6fec947c17fdcaf3d4d2ba556c40.jpg
155 ms
Catamaran-Regular.ttf
59 ms
Catamaran-SemiBold.ttf
80 ms
8vIU7ww63mVu7gtR-kwKxNvkNOjw-tbnfYPlCw.woff
106 ms
embed
809 ms
js
132 ms
gateway.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
No form fields have multiple labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gateway.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
gateway.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gateway.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gateway.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gateway.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gateway. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: