Tools & Wizards About Us
gatewayatdenton.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

gatewayatdenton.com

Student Housing Denton | Student Apartments in Denton

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

949 ms

Page Rendered

566 ms

gatewayatdenton.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gatewayatdenton.com homepage info - get ready to check Gatewayat Denton best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about gatewayatdenton.com

Welcome to the Gateway at Denton. We provide the gold standard of amenities and comfort for student housing in Denton. Check out our apartments today.

Visit gatewayatdenton.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gatewayatdenton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gatewayatdenton.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gatewayatdenton.com

57 ms

gatewayatdenton.com

54 ms

style.min.css

37 ms

style.min.css

43 ms

style.min.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Gatewayatdenton.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (324 ms) relates to the external source Perk.paylode.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.5 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gatewayatdenton.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 83.4 kB

  • Original 104.0 kB
  • After minification 101.0 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gatewayat Denton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 254.9 kB
  • After minification 254.8 kB
  • After compression 235.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 211.7 kB
  • After minification 209.6 kB
  • After compression 206.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gatewayatdenton.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (80%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gatewayat Denton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gatewayatdenton.com

gatewayatdenton.com

57 ms

gatewayatdenton.com

gatewayatdenton.com

54 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

37 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

43 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

47 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

71 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

46 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

58 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

72 ms

fdwpflipclock.css

fdwpflipclock.css

63 ms

styles.css

styles.css

62 ms

TimeCircles.css

TimeCircles.css

78 ms

red-protect.css

red-protect.css

74 ms

redcore.css

redcore.css

76 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

90 ms

nectar-slider.css

nectar-slider.css

92 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

87 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

94 ms

style.css

style.css

96 ms

element-recent-posts.css

element-recent-posts.css

105 ms

css

css

54 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

116 ms

skin-material.css

skin-material.css

119 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

106 ms

widget-nectar-posts.css

widget-nectar-posts.css

122 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

112 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

123 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

143 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

142 ms

TimeCircles.js

TimeCircles.js

141 ms

red-protect.js

red-protect.js

143 ms

gateway-at-denton

gateway-at-denton

324 ms

js

js

69 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

140 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

159 ms

core.css

core.css

159 ms

slide-out-right-material.css

slide-out-right-material.css

160 ms

fdwpflip.js

fdwpflip.js

157 ms

fdwpflipclock.js

fdwpflipclock.js

158 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

65 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

160 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

140 ms

index.js

index.js

144 ms

index.js

index.js

134 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

133 ms

nectar-slider.js

nectar-slider.js

116 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

128 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

131 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

125 ms

priority.js

priority.js

125 ms

nectar-slider-priority.js

nectar-slider-priority.js

128 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

138 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

136 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

135 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

151 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

118 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

146 ms

init.js

init.js

147 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

139 ms

redcore.js

redcore.js

137 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

136 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

54 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

300 ms

ezgif-1881158715.gif

ezgif-1881158715.gif

178 ms

new-ownership-seal.png

new-ownership-seal.png

167 ms

logo-light.png

logo-light.png

65 ms

Logoogoogo-1-1.png

Logoogoogo-1-1.png

165 ms

download.png

download.png

165 ms

Gateway13.jpg

Gateway13.jpg

169 ms

decorategatewayatdenton-600x403.jpeg

decorategatewayatdenton-600x403.jpeg

165 ms

gatewayblogphoto2-1-600x403.jpeg

gatewayblogphoto2-1-600x403.jpeg

165 ms

decorategatewayatdenton-100x100.jpeg

decorategatewayatdenton-100x100.jpeg

172 ms

g-100x100.png

g-100x100.png

173 ms

DSC08855-2.jpg

DSC08855-2.jpg

176 ms

DSC08738.jpg

DSC08738.jpg

109 ms

DSC09390.jpg

DSC09390.jpg

226 ms

gad.png

gad.png

222 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

176 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

177 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

219 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

222 ms

Futura-Bold.woff

Futura-Bold.woff

117 ms

Futura-Bold.woff

Futura-Bold.woff

120 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

119 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

121 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

40 ms

Futura-Bold.ttf

Futura-Bold.ttf

27 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

46 ms

Futura-Bold.svg

Futura-Bold.svg

33 ms

Accessibility Review

gatewayatdenton.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gatewayatdenton.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gatewayatdenton.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gatewayatdenton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gatewayatdenton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gatewayatdenton.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gatewayat Denton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: