Tools & Wizards About Us
gatewayresourcerecovery.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

gatewayresourcerecovery.com

ReSource Salem | C&D Recycling Facility | ReSource Waste Services

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

gatewayresourcerecovery.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gatewayresourcerecovery.com now to see the best up-to-date Gateway Re Source Covery content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gatewayresourcerecovery.com

ReSource Salem accepts a wide variety of construction and demolition (C&D) materials from waste handlers, contractors and homeowners.

Visit gatewayresourcerecovery.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gatewayresourcerecovery.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gatewayresourcerecovery.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

81/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gatewayresourcerecovery.com

77 ms

679 ms

slick.css

31 ms

style.css

105 ms

styles.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gatewayresourcerecovery.com, 71% (44 requests) were made to Resourcewasteservices.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) relates to the external source Resourcewasteservices.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 515.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gatewayresourcerecovery.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 58.1 kB

  • Original 73.7 kB
  • After minification 71.2 kB
  • After compression 15.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gateway Re Source Covery images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 271.5 kB

  • Original 490.0 kB
  • After minification 490.0 kB
  • After compression 218.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 271.5 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 185.8 kB

  • Original 211.9 kB
  • After minification 210.1 kB
  • After compression 26.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gatewayresourcerecovery.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (45%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gateway Re Source Covery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gatewayresourcerecovery.com

gatewayresourcerecovery.com

77 ms

679 ms

slick.css

slick.css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

105 ms

styles.css

styles.css

51 ms

extend.css

extend.css

56 ms

css

css

46 ms

js

js

365 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

92 ms

cleantalk-public.min.css

cleantalk-public.min.css

39 ms

style-frontend-pro.1.20.1.css

style-frontend-pro.1.20.1.css

84 ms

job-listings.css

job-listings.css

52 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

51 ms

srpw-frontend.css

srpw-frontend.css

59 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

165 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

68 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

75 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

181 ms

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js

37 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

92 ms

counter.js

counter.js

42 ms

front-end-free.1.20.1.js

front-end-free.1.20.1.js

166 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

26 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

17 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

204 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

213 ms

embed

embed

382 ms

e8a03f82596107bb2efea72e177da4ef.gif

e8a03f82596107bb2efea72e177da4ef.gif

259 ms

ReSourceWaste_NOTAG.png

ReSourceWaste_NOTAG.png

232 ms

Locations-Salem_NH_Featured-Image-600x400.jpg

Locations-Salem_NH_Featured-Image-600x400.jpg

243 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-119-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-119-600x400.jpg

233 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-75-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-75-600x400.jpg

233 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-153-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-153-600x400.jpg

232 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-48-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-48-600x400.jpg

232 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-129-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-129-600x400.jpg

242 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-14-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-14-600x400.jpg

243 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-125-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-125-600x400.jpg

242 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-10-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-10-600x400.jpg

241 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-82-600x400.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-82-600x400.jpg

240 ms

Facility_Products-We-Create-600x400.jpg

Facility_Products-We-Create-600x400.jpg

263 ms

Dave-Guilherme-150x150.jpg

Dave-Guilherme-150x150.jpg

261 ms

David-Devito-150x150.jpg

David-Devito-150x150.jpg

262 ms

Jack-Canty-S.jpg

Jack-Canty-S.jpg

329 ms

plastic-1.svg

plastic-1.svg

258 ms

bulldozer.svg

bulldozer.svg

260 ms

workers.svg

workers.svg

270 ms

cogwheels.svg

cogwheels.svg

276 ms

magnet.svg

magnet.svg

275 ms

sustainable.svg

sustainable.svg

270 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-129.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-129.jpg

365 ms

ReSource-Waste-Services-Breakfast-scaled.jpg

ReSource-Waste-Services-Breakfast-scaled.jpg

359 ms

resource-logo-tmp-inverted-300x65.png

resource-logo-tmp-inverted-300x65.png

326 ms

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-75-1024x683.jpg

ReEnergy_Salem_NH_20191018-75-1024x683.jpg

194 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

142 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

188 ms

lynx.woff

lynx.woff

190 ms

NmZIDX0=

NmZIDX0=

36 ms

t.php

t.php

211 ms

js

js

152 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

54 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

js

js

69 ms

Accessibility Review

gatewayresourcerecovery.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gatewayresourcerecovery.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gatewayresourcerecovery.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gatewayresourcerecovery.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gatewayresourcerecovery.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gatewayresourcerecovery.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gateway Re Source Covery. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: