Tools & Wizards About Us
gbargo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

gbargo.com

Home - Grupo Bargo

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

545 ms

gbargo.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing G Bargo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gbargo.com

Somos una empresa especializada en la comercialización de productos del mercado hidráulico. Hacemos posible tu proyecto | Grupo Bargo

Visit gbargo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gbargo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gbargo.com performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,820 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.428

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.2 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gbargo.com

1476 ms

build.css

1571 ms

construccion.jpg

470 ms

rehabilitacion-sin-abrir-zanja-main.jpg

20 ms

wall-e.jpg

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Gbargo.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to I1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gbargo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.8 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gbargo.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. G Bargo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 133.4 kB

  • Original 190.5 kB
  • After minification 190.5 kB
  • After compression 57.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 83.9 kB

  • Original 105.2 kB
  • After minification 105.2 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gbargo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

23

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of G Bargo. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

gbargo.com

gbargo.com

1476 ms

build.css

build.css

1571 ms

construccion.jpg

construccion.jpg

470 ms

rehabilitacion-sin-abrir-zanja-main.jpg

rehabilitacion-sin-abrir-zanja-main.jpg

20 ms

wall-e.jpg

wall-e.jpg

17 ms

Ecoloplastik.png

Ecoloplastik.png

1207 ms

bandg.png

bandg.png

1301 ms

bg-robotics.png

bg-robotics.png

1211 ms

ductiline.png

ductiline.png

1293 ms

infraroad.png

infraroad.png

1295 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

2219 ms

elaboracion-de-proyecto.jpg

elaboracion-de-proyecto.jpg

791 ms

apertura-de-descarga.jpg

apertura-de-descarga.jpg

1235 ms

instalacion.jpg

instalacion.jpg

14 ms

limpieza-y-desazolve.jpg

limpieza-y-desazolve.jpg

15 ms

rehabilitacion-sin-abrir-zanja.jpg

rehabilitacion-sin-abrir-zanja.jpg

10 ms

Asesoria.jpg

Asesoria.jpg

18 ms

camionbg.jpg

camionbg.jpg

539 ms

15.jpg

15.jpg

59 ms

dsc6075.jpg

dsc6075.jpg

429 ms

logo-original.png

logo-original.png

1124 ms

pattwhite.png

pattwhite.png

1003 ms

stop-reading-bg.jpg

stop-reading-bg.jpg

1382 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1062 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

1386 ms

build.js

build.js

1396 ms

Accessibility Review

gbargo.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gbargo.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

gbargo.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gbargo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gbargo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf8. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gbargo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of G Bargo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: