Tools & Wizards About Us
gbibp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

gbibp.com

GBIBP-Business Directory, Product Reviews, Buy & Sale

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

491 ms

gbibp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gbibp.com homepage info - get ready to check GBIBP best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about gbibp.com

Anyone can submit business detail to be enlisted, reviews, buy & sale products and services with price and many more in GBIBP.

Visit gbibp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gbibp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gbibp.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,750 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gbibp.com

36 ms

gbibp.com

301 ms

www.gbibp.com

1020 ms

adsbygoogle.js

231 ms

front.css

317 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Gbibp.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gbibp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 182.5 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

923.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gbibp.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 533.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 105.5 kB

  • Original 122.4 kB
  • After minification 122.4 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 43.8 kB

  • Original 243.7 kB
  • After minification 200.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, GBIBP needs image optimization as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 33.3 kB

  • Original 533.3 kB
  • After minification 533.3 kB
  • After compression 500.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9 B

  • Original 206.9 kB
  • After minification 206.9 kB
  • After compression 206.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gbibp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (79%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GBIBP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gbibp.com

gbibp.com

36 ms

gbibp.com

gbibp.com

301 ms

www.gbibp.com

www.gbibp.com

1020 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

231 ms

front.css

front.css

317 ms

icons.css

icons.css

289 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

277 ms

glyphicon.css

glyphicon.css

291 ms

ionicons.css

ionicons.css

299 ms

Linearicons.css

Linearicons.css

286 ms

materialdesignicons.css

materialdesignicons.css

301 ms

Pe-icon-7.css

Pe-icon-7.css

314 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

542 ms

themify.css

themify.css

566 ms

typicons.css

typicons.css

587 ms

weathericons.css

weathericons.css

578 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

225 ms

front1.js

front1.js

701 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

494 ms

app.js

app.js

800 ms

front2.js

front2.js

824 ms

sweetalert2.all.js

sweetalert2.all.js

824 ms

form.js

form.js

798 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

863 ms

select2.js

select2.js

824 ms

js

js

60 ms

bootstrap3-typeahead.min.js

bootstrap3-typeahead.min.js

45 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

218 ms

logo.png

logo.png

485 ms

c86dfa6f10670bfe802a742eac52b70d

c86dfa6f10670bfe802a742eac52b70d

1141 ms

load.gif

load.gif

574 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

717 ms

Material-Design-Iconic-Font.woff

Material-Design-Iconic-Font.woff

671 ms

anchor

anchor

123 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

41 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

44 ms

js

js

127 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

124 ms

OIgm6ct-G6hNh5i9U8xy5lNjsT6YVTG9uZdpykbdxBU.js

OIgm6ct-G6hNh5i9U8xy5lNjsT6YVTG9uZdpykbdxBU.js

88 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

86 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

71 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

187 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

229 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

277 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

101 ms

Accessibility Review

gbibp.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gbibp.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gbibp.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gbibp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gbibp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gbibp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GBIBP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: