3.6 sec in total
316 ms
2.6 sec
615 ms
Visit gcicom.net now to see the best up-to-date Gcicom content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gcicom.net
Nasstar is a managed service provider and leading Microsoft and AWS Partner, specialising in technology transformation and solutions to help your business succeed.
Visit gcicom.netWe analyzed Gcicom.net page load time and found that the first response time was 316 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gcicom.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value18.3 s
0/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value1,370 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value15.9 s
6/100
10%
316 ms
451 ms
581 ms
166 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gcicom.net, 83% (40 requests) were made to Nasstar.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (982 ms) relates to the external source Nasstar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 73.9 kB (12%)
602.1 kB
528.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Gcicom.net main page is 602.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 532.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gcicom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 119 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119 B or 24% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gcicom.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (23%)
35
27
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gcicom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
gcicom.net
316 ms
www.gcicom.net
451 ms
www.nasstar.com
581 ms
google_tag.script.js
166 ms
css_Zqwk3hblB_GrbxwSaOqIPClZZ8HusIgVKGoLs_hvrUE.css
241 ms
bootstrap.min.css
50 ms
css_m1nyd9bw0lX6MzvwIO7lrvvTAXHMtU7KQQ4CwpnlrWI.css
317 ms
mobile-menu-icon.svg
239 ms
nasstar-orange.svg
240 ms
homepage-banner3v2.png
471 ms
Modernise-to-maximisev2.png
396 ms
homepage-image-1.png
622 ms
explore-our-latest-insightsv2.png
387 ms
js_5VaclEWL5FZZXDNuT-ATpJa99z3MSkv1AnCC_JhdMUI.js
403 ms
bootstrap.min.js
31 ms
86f0198d6e.js
47 ms
js_rfV7SxcfY_SxSx8Y9sYCbkDwVErVhdU5O9tiqN7gFxc.js
316 ms
typeit.min.js
110 ms
js_lBJJqkE1HQl1Ita6r5y2OIPiIzen91tLUAzn2C_IXv8.js
400 ms
Rail%20Delivery%20Group%20logo-01.png
436 ms
Nasstar---Why-Managed-Security-is-Cost-Effective_3.jpg
436 ms
slash.svg
478 ms
nasstar-white.svg
483 ms
service-box-left.svg
230 ms
service-box-right.svg
232 ms
icon-cyber-security-as-a-service-1.svg
234 ms
icon-network-services-1.svg
303 ms
icon-book-your-free-cloud-assessment.svg
311 ms
icon-external-vulnerability.svg
310 ms
icon-flexible-it.svg
312 ms
related-bg-1.svg
311 ms
cs-pink-bg.png
378 ms
banner-1-v.png
380 ms
footer-graphic-desktop-large@2x.png
389 ms
footer-bottom-graphic-desktop-xlarge.png
389 ms
footer-bottom-graphic-inner.png
388 ms
SegoeUI.woff
681 ms
SegoeUI-Light.woff
566 ms
SegoeUI-Semibold.woff
802 ms
SegoeUI-Bold.woff
733 ms
SegoeUIBlack.woff
663 ms
SegoeUI-Italic.woff
680 ms
SegoeUI-LightItalic.woff
659 ms
SegoeUI-SemiboldItalic.woff
753 ms
SegoeUI-BoldItalic.woff
982 ms
SegoeUIBlack-Italic.woff
753 ms
gtm.js
69 ms
OtAutoBlock.js
39 ms
gcicom.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
gcicom.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gcicom.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gcicom.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gcicom.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gcicom.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gcicom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: