4.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.6 sec
333 ms
Click here to check amazing Gcp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gcp.ink
At Graphicolor Printing, we really mean and do what we say. No need to worry, we'll ensure that your printed pieces achieve the graphic perfection you expect. We're based in New Berlin, Wisc...
Visit gcp.inkWe analyzed Gcp.ink page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gcp.ink performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
18/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.469
18/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
1097 ms
80 ms
34 ms
89 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Gcp.ink, 34% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gcp.ink.
Page size can be reduced by 725.7 kB (41%)
1.8 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Gcp.ink main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 771.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 174.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gcp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 528.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 528.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gcp.ink needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (66%)
41
14
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gcp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gcp.ink
1097 ms
style.css
80 ms
css
34 ms
style.css
89 ms
jquery.min.js
198 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
108 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
105 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
105 ms
public.js
193 ms
et-divi-customizer-global.min.css
130 ms
js
54 ms
js
107 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
147 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
143 ms
style.css
154 ms
idle-timer.min.js
190 ms
custom.js
218 ms
scripts.min.js
379 ms
smoothscroll.js
194 ms
common.js
230 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
378 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
239 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
232 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
260 ms
custom.js
377 ms
idle-timer.min.js
273 ms
style.css
204 ms
insight.min.js
93 ms
V22019_GCP_Logo_No_Tag_RBG.png
77 ms
preloader.gif
55 ms
V3Relax_type.png
77 ms
yardsign.jpg
311 ms
Web_Literature_Rack.jpg
77 ms
web_nosh.png
131 ms
Circle_ballot_.png
129 ms
SG2May012018_0067.png
221 ms
FreqBroch_DSC7126.png
347 ms
xFor_Web_V3_White_Tag_Line_Graphicolor-Logo.png
221 ms
premade-image-16.png
221 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
153 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
211 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xo.woff
244 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf
244 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xo.woff
243 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf
244 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xo.woff
244 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf
244 ms
modules.woff
225 ms
eLGcP-PxIg-5H0vC37oIzA.woff
275 ms
eLGcP-PxIg-5H0vC37oIzw.ttf
275 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff
247 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
246 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo.woff
245 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf
245 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdo.woff
275 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf
275 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo.woff
274 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
274 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdo.woff
292 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
290 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdo.woff
290 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf
291 ms
lftracker_v1_4lZPGEjvpGXELpBk.js
530 ms
insight_tag_errors.gif
360 ms
style.min.css
48 ms
gcp.ink accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gcp.ink best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gcp.ink SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gcp.ink can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gcp.ink main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gcp.ink
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gcp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: