Tools & Wizards About Us
gctanks.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

gctanks.com

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

23 ms

Resources Loaded

7.1 sec

Page Rendered

422 ms

gctanks.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gctanks.com now to see the best up-to-date Gctanks content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gctanks.com

FORGE specializes in design & installation of top-tier storage tanks. Industry leaders in safety, quality, and customer partnership.

Visit gctanks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gctanks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gctanks.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,200 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.768

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.1 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gctanks.com

23 ms

forge-global.com

5965 ms

gtm.js

64 ms

41c23ec632057e6ab74f9a96d5dab54d.js

147 ms

stat.js

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gctanks.com, 80% (59 requests) were made to Forge-global.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) relates to the external source Forge-global.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 138.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Gctanks.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 136.0 kB

  • Original 169.5 kB
  • After minification 166.8 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 207 B

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gctanks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 269.0 kB
  • After minification 269.0 kB
  • After compression 266.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (67%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gctanks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gctanks.com

gctanks.com

23 ms

forge-global.com

forge-global.com

5965 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

64 ms

41c23ec632057e6ab74f9a96d5dab54d.js

41c23ec632057e6ab74f9a96d5dab54d.js

147 ms

stat.js

stat.js

178 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

151 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

161 ms

remodal.min.js

remodal.min.js

71 ms

front-end.js

front-end.js

148 ms

wpgmza_data.js

wpgmza_data.js

93 ms

js

js

68 ms

wpstg-blank-loader.min.js

wpstg-blank-loader.min.js

199 ms

mailin-front.js

mailin-front.js

200 ms

cv.js

cv.js

329 ms

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

page-scroll-to-id.min.js

330 ms

dismiss.js

dismiss.js

204 ms

genesis-block-theme.js

genesis-block-theme.js

329 ms

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

wpfront-scroll-top.min.js

329 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

373 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

330 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

417 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

373 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

348 ms

index.js

index.js

348 ms

index.js

index.js

348 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

382 ms

api.js

api.js

96 ms

index.js

index.js

381 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

437 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

458 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

477 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

459 ms

so-video-widget.min.js

so-video-widget.min.js

458 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

466 ms

animate.min.js

animate.min.js

489 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

489 ms

so-premium-image-overlay.min.js

so-premium-image-overlay.min.js

490 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

491 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

523 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

522 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

524 ms

conditional_logic.min.js

conditional_logic.min.js

444 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

425 ms

swap.js

swap.js

396 ms

sa.js

sa.js

168 ms

896222461

896222461

256 ms

FORGE-logo_128h.svg

FORGE-logo_128h.svg

538 ms

forge-potable-water-storage-tanks_1024-1.jpg

forge-potable-water-storage-tanks_1024-1.jpg

449 ms

forge-fire-protection-storage-systems_1280.jpg

forge-fire-protection-storage-systems_1280.jpg

578 ms

forge-industrial-wastewater_1280_1.jpg

forge-industrial-wastewater_1280_1.jpg

659 ms

forge-oil-gas-solutions_1280_1.jpg

forge-oil-gas-solutions_1280_1.jpg

660 ms

forge-renewable-energy-bioenergy_768.jpg

forge-renewable-energy-bioenergy_768.jpg

542 ms

forge-bulk-storage_1280.jpg

forge-bulk-storage_1280.jpg

528 ms

forge-aluminum-geodesic-domes_1280_3.jpg

forge-aluminum-geodesic-domes_1280_3.jpg

609 ms

forge-standing-seam-vertical-insulation_1280_1.jpg

forge-standing-seam-vertical-insulation_1280_1.jpg

548 ms

forge-tank-liners_1280.jpg

forge-tank-liners_1280.jpg

529 ms

FORGE-logo-black_128h.svg

FORGE-logo-black_128h.svg

529 ms

d

d

44 ms

d

d

97 ms

d

d

100 ms

d

d

98 ms

d

d

99 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

61 ms

gbicons.woff

gbicons.woff

564 ms

osha-logo_75h.png

osha-logo_75h.png

632 ms

msha-logo_75h.png

msha-logo_75h.png

634 ms

isn-logo_75h.png

isn-logo_75h.png

633 ms

nsc-logo_75h.png

nsc-logo_75h.png

614 ms

hasc-logo_75h.png

hasc-logo_75h.png

607 ms

browz-logo_75h.png

browz-logo_75h.png

604 ms

external_forms.js

external_forms.js

40 ms

896222461

896222461

203 ms

d

d

14 ms

1.png

1.png

116 ms

Accessibility Review

gctanks.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gctanks.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gctanks.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gctanks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gctanks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gctanks.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gctanks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: