23.1 sec in total
27 ms
22.6 sec
486 ms
Welcome to gecc.org homepage info - get ready to check Gecc best content right away, or after learning these important things about gecc.org
Glen Echo Country Club
Visit gecc.orgWe analyzed Gecc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 23.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
gecc.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value34.8 s
0/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.282
43/100
15%
Value11.7 s
18/100
10%
27 ms
398 ms
24 ms
43 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Gecc.org, 15% (10 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Static.clubessential.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Gecc.org.
Page size can be reduced by 134.5 kB (18%)
754.7 kB
620.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Gecc.org main page is 754.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 517.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gecc needs image optimization as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 93% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gecc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (63%)
52
19
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gecc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gecc.org
27 ms
www.gecc.org
398 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
43 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
43 ms
bootstrap.min.js
24 ms
notify-custom.min.js
42 ms
axisScripts.js
42 ms
axisDialogBox.js
79 ms
albumScripts.js
78 ms
bootstrap.min.css
88 ms
global.css
79 ms
albumStyles.css
78 ms
GlenEcho2019.css
93 ms
jquery-ui.css
110 ms
mediabox.min.css
86 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
194 ms
WebResource.axd
186 ms
ScriptResource.axd
240 ms
ScriptResource.axd
181 ms
ScriptResource.axd
240 ms
ScriptResource.axd
183 ms
ScriptResource.axd
283 ms
ScriptResource.axd
245 ms
FormPay.css
198 ms
FormPay.js
204 ms
api.js
76 ms
mediabox.min.js
114 ms
globalScripts.js
209 ms
CEBootstrapShiv.css
155 ms
ttz8ado.css
297 ms
nucleo-glyph.css
143 ms
p.css
28 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
getImage.gif
1406 ms
getImage.gif
396 ms
plg_corner.gif
245 ms
loading2.gif
245 ms
d
95 ms
d
227 ms
d
227 ms
d
157 ms
d
375 ms
d
376 ms
collect
57 ms
header_logo_private.png
56 ms
d
168 ms
d
168 ms
d
501 ms
footerLogo.png
37 ms
recaptcha__en.js
151 ms
js
147 ms
nucleo-glyph.woff
733 ms
undefined
222 ms
bootstrap.min.1024.css
55 ms
LoadPhotoAlbum
1012 ms
LoadPhotoAlbum
511 ms
getImage.gif
632 ms
pubHomeBottomPhotoAlbumBG.png
14 ms
getImage.gif
221 ms
getImage.gif
514 ms
getImage.gif
726 ms
scrollDownArrow.png
47 ms
getImage.gif
600 ms
getImage.gif
438 ms
gecc.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gecc.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gecc.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gecc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gecc.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
gecc.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gecc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: