Tools & Wizards About Us
gecg.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

gecg.in

Guntur Engineering College

Page Load Speed

14.8 sec in total

First Response

807 ms

Resources Loaded

13.3 sec

Page Rendered

724 ms

gecg.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gecg.in homepage info - get ready to check Gecg best content for Denmark right away, or after learning these important things about gecg.in

Best Engineering College

Visit gecg.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Gecg.in page load time and found that the first response time was 807 ms and then it took 14 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gecg.in performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gecg.in

807 ms

bootstrap.min.css

373 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

420 ms

animate.css

423 ms

css-plugin-collections.css

634 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Gecg.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10 sec) relates to the external source Via.placeholder.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 266.4 kB (5%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gecg.in main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-93%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

  • Original 154.5 kB
  • After minification 81.4 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 73.1 kB, which is 47% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 93% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 96.5 kB

  • Original 4.3 MB
  • After minification 4.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gecg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 419.1 kB
  • After minification 419.1 kB
  • After compression 413.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 155.0 kB
  • After minification 155.0 kB
  • After compression 134.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gecg.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (44%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gecg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gecg.in

gecg.in

807 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

373 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

420 ms

animate.css

animate.css

423 ms

css-plugin-collections.css

css-plugin-collections.css

634 ms

menuzord-rounded-boxed.css

menuzord-rounded-boxed.css

427 ms

style-main.css

style-main.css

646 ms

preloader.css

preloader.css

560 ms

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

627 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

633 ms

settings.css

settings.css

643 ms

layers.css

layers.css

748 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

835 ms

theme-skin-color-set-1.css

theme-skin-color-set-1.css

842 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

844 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

1276 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

857 ms

jquery-plugin-collection.js

jquery-plugin-collection.js

1684 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1250 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1054 ms

custom.js

custom.js

877 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

893 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

1087 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

1088 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

1109 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

1279 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

1299 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

1299 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

1310 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

1324 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1025 ms

font-awesome-animation.min.css

font-awesome-animation.min.css

1048 ms

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

1049 ms

flaticon-set-carfixing.css

flaticon-set-carfixing.css

1060 ms

utility-classes.css

utility-classes.css

1076 ms

css

css

31 ms

close.png

close.png

219 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

226 ms

prev.png

prev.png

225 ms

next.png

next.png

225 ms

logoround.jpg

logoround.jpg

626 ms

logonew1.jpg

logonew1.jpg

875 ms

logo2.jpg

logo2.jpg

526 ms

bg5.jpg

bg5.jpg

1528 ms

bg7.jpg

bg7.jpg

1526 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

742 ms

80x55

80x55

77 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

632 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

685 ms

p1.jpg

p1.jpg

781 ms

p2.jpg

p2.jpg

894 ms

p3.jpg

p3.jpg

905 ms

p4.jpg

p4.jpg

970 ms

p5.jpg

p5.jpg

1032 ms

p6.jpg

p6.jpg

1103 ms

as7.jpg

as7.jpg

1120 ms

as8.jpg

as8.jpg

1158 ms

as9.jpg

as9.jpg

1244 ms

as10.jpg

as10.jpg

1311 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1337 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1537 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

1456 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

1726 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

1555 ms

p1.jpg

p1.jpg

1670 ms

p2.jpg

p2.jpg

1685 ms

p3.jpg

p3.jpg

1683 ms

p4.jpg

p4.jpg

1721 ms

p5.jpg

p5.jpg

1770 ms

p6.jpg

p6.jpg

1879 ms

p7.jpg

p7.jpg

1893 ms

p8.jpg

p8.jpg

1896 ms

p9.jpg

p9.jpg

1909 ms

p10.jpg

p10.jpg

1936 ms

logonew.jpg

logonew.jpg

1984 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

132 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

452 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

554 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

554 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

553 ms

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

fontawesome-webfont3295.woff

2079 ms

bootstrap-parent-modal.html

bootstrap-parent-modal.html

1789 ms

style-switcher.html

style-switcher.html

1547 ms

80x55

80x55

10004 ms

revicons90c6.woff

revicons90c6.woff

1506 ms

ab1.jpg

ab1.jpg

1524 ms

bg6.jpg

bg6.jpg

1521 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

1620 ms

Accessibility Review

gecg.in accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gecg.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gecg.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gecg.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gecg.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gecg.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gecg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: