2.1 sec in total
308 ms
892 ms
903 ms
Visit gedit.net now to see the best up-to-date Gedit content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gedit.net
Artikel, Tutorials und Weblog zu Themen wie Web Design, Web Development, Web Standards, Accessibility, Usability, Online Business, Online Marketing, SEO, HTML, CSS, XML, SVG, Javascript/DOM, Ajax, SSI...
Visit gedit.netWe analyzed Gedit.net page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
gedit.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.2 s
99/100
10%
Value1.3 s
100/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
308 ms
103 ms
244 ms
326 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gedit.net, 75% (15 requests) were made to Img.gedit.net and 10% (2 requests) were made to Css.gedit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (391 ms) relates to the external source Img.gedit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 29.7 kB (82%)
36.3 kB
6.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Gedit.net main page is 36.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 35.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.8 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 344 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 344 B or 53% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (78%)
18
4
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gedit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
gedit.net
308 ms
default.js
103 ms
style.css.php
244 ms
goto-top.gif
326 ms
druckvorschau.gif
333 ms
wong.gif
333 ms
del.gif
335 ms
reddit.gif
335 ms
digg.gif
332 ms
stumbleupon.gif
335 ms
slashdot.gif
336 ms
furl.gif
335 ms
yahoo.gif
357 ms
google.gif
357 ms
technorati.gif
375 ms
akvorrat.gif
383 ms
opera.gif
391 ms
piwik.js
290 ms
link_extern.gif
209 ms
style.css.php
95 ms
gedit.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
gedit.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
gedit.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gedit.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gedit.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gedit.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gedit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: