Tools & Wizards About Us
geilolaft.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

geilolaft.no

Fjellhytter i utsøkt kvalitet - Skreddersøm og ferdighytter | Geilo Laft

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

438 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

540 ms

geilolaft.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Geilo Laft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about geilolaft.no

Fjellhytter med solide dimensjoner, utsøkte detaljer og en suveren kvalitet. Les mer! ✅ Tradisjonell og moderne design ✅ Bindingsverk ✅ Stavlaft ✅ Håndlaft

Visit geilolaft.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Geilolaft.no page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

geilolaft.no performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,130 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.439

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

geilolaft.no

438 ms

geilolaft.no

2102 ms

grid.css

231 ms

base.css

347 ms

layout.css

467 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Geilolaft.no, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Geilolaft.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.1 kB (2%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Geilolaft.no main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 104.3 kB

  • Original 127.5 kB
  • After minification 125.1 kB
  • After compression 23.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 137 B

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Geilo Laft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 194 B

  • Original 182.6 kB
  • After minification 182.6 kB
  • After compression 182.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 19.5 kB

  • Original 118.9 kB
  • After minification 117.8 kB
  • After compression 99.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Geilolaft.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (81%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Geilo Laft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

geilolaft.no

geilolaft.no

438 ms

geilolaft.no

geilolaft.no

2102 ms

grid.css

grid.css

231 ms

base.css

base.css

347 ms

layout.css

layout.css

467 ms

blog.css

blog.css

375 ms

postslider.css

postslider.css

356 ms

buttons.css

buttons.css

356 ms

comments.css

comments.css

360 ms

slideshow.css

slideshow.css

460 ms

gallery.css

gallery.css

471 ms

gallery_horizontal.css

gallery_horizontal.css

471 ms

grid_row.css

grid_row.css

478 ms

heading.css

heading.css

489 ms

hr.css

hr.css

575 ms

icon.css

icon.css

578 ms

image.css

image.css

584 ms

image_hotspots.css

image_hotspots.css

584 ms

masonry_entries.css

masonry_entries.css

591 ms

avia-snippet-site-preloader.css

avia-snippet-site-preloader.css

602 ms

promobox.css

promobox.css

689 ms

slideshow_accordion.css

slideshow_accordion.css

693 ms

social_share.css

social_share.css

697 ms

tabs.css

tabs.css

698 ms

testimonials.css

testimonials.css

710 ms

toggles.css

toggles.css

722 ms

video.css

video.css

803 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

809 ms

styles.css

styles.css

814 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

816 ms

avia-snippet-fold-unfold.css

avia-snippet-fold-unfold.css

822 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

834 ms

avia-snippet-lightbox.css

avia-snippet-lightbox.css

915 ms

avia-snippet-widget.css

avia-snippet-widget.css

922 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

931 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

930 ms

geilo_laft.css

geilo_laft.css

1052 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

custom.css

custom.css

848 ms

style.css

style.css

811 ms

avia-snippet-cookieconsent.css

avia-snippet-cookieconsent.css

699 ms

post-13.css

post-13.css

699 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

815 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

713 ms

avia-head-scripts-88f307861d1b26ca1fd07d7593f5cb24---64f060e5f0f74.js

avia-head-scripts-88f307861d1b26ca1fd07d7593f5cb24---64f060e5f0f74.js

781 ms

index.js

index.js

699 ms

index.js

index.js

699 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

751 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

842 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

808 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

798 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

710 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

728 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

721 ms

index.js

index.js

799 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

797 ms

avia-footer-scripts-845ac56c65f7f6cf6f75d31778f08f8a---64f060e655d89.js

avia-footer-scripts-845ac56c65f7f6cf6f75d31778f08f8a---64f060e655d89.js

1031 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

78 ms

2022-11-01-geilo-laft-standard-hyttemodell-Lia-3D-render-scaled.jpg

2022-11-01-geilo-laft-standard-hyttemodell-Lia-3D-render-scaled.jpg

947 ms

P196-geilo-laft-hytte-peis-GLL-12191-845x321.jpg

P196-geilo-laft-hytte-peis-GLL-12191-845x321.jpg

645 ms

maiandra-bold.ttf

maiandra-bold.ttf

283 ms

calibri.ttf

calibri.ttf

622 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

404 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

39 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

collect

collect

30 ms

js

js

46 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

117 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

154 ms

Geilo-Laft-Logo_Signatur_BRUN-FRILAGD-H156px-300x43.png

Geilo-Laft-Logo_Signatur_BRUN-FRILAGD-H156px-300x43.png

269 ms

geilo-laft-hytte-modell-Hallingskarvet-GLL-14640-1030x507.jpg

geilo-laft-hytte-modell-Hallingskarvet-GLL-14640-1030x507.jpg

692 ms

P103-geilo-laft-bygge-hytte-GLL-14992-1030x507.jpg

P103-geilo-laft-bygge-hytte-GLL-14992-1030x507.jpg

698 ms

P209-geilo-laft-nokkelferdig-hytta-GLL-12848-1030x507.jpg

P209-geilo-laft-nokkelferdig-hytta-GLL-12848-1030x507.jpg

354 ms

geilo-laft-Solbakken-Hyttegrend-GLL-11264.jpg

geilo-laft-Solbakken-Hyttegrend-GLL-11264.jpg

125 ms

Accessibility Review

geilolaft.no accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

geilolaft.no best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

geilolaft.no SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Geilolaft.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Geilolaft.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

geilolaft.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Geilo Laft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: