5.6 sec in total
445 ms
4.6 sec
537 ms
Click here to check amazing Geilo Laft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about geilolaft.no
Fjellhytter med solide dimensjoner, utsøkte detaljer og en suveren kvalitet. Les mer! ✅ Tradisjonell og moderne design ✅ Bindingsverk ✅ Stavlaft ✅ Håndlaft
Visit geilolaft.noWe analyzed Geilolaft.no page load time and found that the first response time was 445 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
geilolaft.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value2,760 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.439
21/100
15%
Value22.9 s
1/100
10%
445 ms
2133 ms
219 ms
331 ms
449 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Geilolaft.no, 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Geilolaft.no.
Page size can be reduced by 156.7 kB (3%)
4.6 MB
4.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Geilolaft.no main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 102.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Geilo Laft images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Geilolaft.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (88%)
65
8
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Geilo Laft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
geilolaft.no
445 ms
geilolaft.no
2133 ms
grid.css
219 ms
base.css
331 ms
layout.css
449 ms
blog.css
343 ms
postslider.css
346 ms
buttons.css
341 ms
comments.css
345 ms
slideshow.css
443 ms
gallery.css
455 ms
gallery_horizontal.css
457 ms
grid_row.css
456 ms
heading.css
457 ms
hr.css
553 ms
icon.css
559 ms
image.css
563 ms
image_hotspots.css
565 ms
masonry_entries.css
565 ms
avia-snippet-site-preloader.css
566 ms
promobox.css
664 ms
slideshow_accordion.css
670 ms
social_share.css
674 ms
tabs.css
677 ms
testimonials.css
675 ms
toggles.css
677 ms
video.css
774 ms
style.min.css
784 ms
styles.css
788 ms
shortcodes.css
791 ms
avia-snippet-fold-unfold.css
788 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
789 ms
avia-snippet-lightbox.css
884 ms
avia-snippet-widget.css
893 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
894 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
896 ms
geilo_laft.css
1012 ms
api.js
33 ms
custom.css
798 ms
style.css
784 ms
avia-snippet-cookieconsent.css
679 ms
post-13.css
671 ms
jquery.min.js
784 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
670 ms
avia-head-scripts-88f307861d1b26ca1fd07d7593f5cb24---64f060e5f0f74.js
769 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
679 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
670 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
717 ms
hooks.min.js
716 ms
i18n.min.js
781 ms
index.js
785 ms
index.js
694 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
709 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
794 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
704 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
772 ms
index.js
779 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
683 ms
avia-footer-scripts-845ac56c65f7f6cf6f75d31778f08f8a---64f060e655d89.js
799 ms
gtm.js
100 ms
2022-11-01-geilo-laft-standard-hyttemodell-Lia-3D-render-scaled.jpg
929 ms
geilo-laft-hytte-modell-Hallingskarvet-GLL-14640-1030x507.jpg
762 ms
P196-geilo-laft-hytte-peis-GLL-12191-845x321.jpg
747 ms
maiandra-bold.ttf
402 ms
calibri.ttf
530 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
424 ms
recaptcha__en.js
27 ms
Logo.png
307 ms
Geilo-Laft-Logo_Signatur_BRUN-FRILAGD-H156px-300x43.png
314 ms
P103-geilo-laft-bygge-hytte-GLL-14992-1030x507.jpg
772 ms
geilolaft.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
geilolaft.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
geilolaft.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Geilolaft.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Geilolaft.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
geilolaft.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Geilo Laft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: