Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

gematrix.org

Gematria Calculator

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

78 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

117 ms

gematrix.org screenshot

About Website

Visit gematrix.org now to see the best up-to-date Gematrix content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gematrix.org

Online Gematria Calculator with same phrases values search and words. English Gematria, Hebrew Gematria and Jewish Gematria and Numerology

Visit gematrix.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Gematrix.org page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gematrix.org performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,170 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gematrix.org

78 ms

www.gematrix.org

565 ms

gematrix.css

5 ms

gematrix.js

6 ms

show_ads.js

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Gematrix.org, 17% (19 requests) were made to Um.simpli.fi and 10% (11 requests) were made to Tags.bluekai.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (565 ms) belongs to the original domain Gematrix.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 335.3 kB (52%)

Content Size

646.6 kB

After Optimization

311.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Gematrix.org main page is 646.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 486.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 94.5 kB

  • Original 132.4 kB
  • After minification 129.7 kB
  • After compression 37.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 26.8 kB
  • After minification 24.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gematrix images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 237.5 kB

  • Original 486.2 kB
  • After minification 486.0 kB
  • After compression 248.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 237.5 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 734 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.1 kB
  • After compression 504 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gematrix.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 734 B or 59% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (74%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gematrix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gematrix.org accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

gematrix.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gematrix.org SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gematrix.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gematrix.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gematrix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: