2.8 sec in total
900 ms
1.8 sec
58 ms
Click here to check amazing Gempack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gempack.in
We manufacture bags of Export worthy and in different configuration as per requirement of the buyer from 1 Kg-50Kg packing. We have the required infrastructures and an expertise of more than a decade.
Visit gempack.inWe analyzed Gempack.in page load time and found that the first response time was 900 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
gempack.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value5.0 s
27/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
900 ms
881 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gempack.in, 33% (1 request) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (900 ms) belongs to the original domain Gempack.in.
Page size can be reduced by 908 B (5%)
18.9 kB
18.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Gempack.in main page is 18.9 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 874 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 874 B or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
1
1
The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gempack. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
gempack.in
900 ms
gempack.in
881 ms
ga.js
23 ms
gempack.in accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
gempack.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
gempack.in SEO score
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gempack.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gempack.in main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
gempack.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gempack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: