Tools & Wizards About Us
gemshavings.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

gemshavings.com

GEM Shavings Wood Shavings | Auburn, WA | 253-631-1835

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

282 ms

gemshavings.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gemshavings.com now to see the best up-to-date GEM Shavings content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gemshavings.com

High quality screened baled wood shavings, bagged wood shavings from soft wood for horse stall bedding, farm animals bedding. Kiln-dried shavings, clean, dry bedding shavings and sawdust. Order today ...

Visit gemshavings.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gemshavings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gemshavings.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.379

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gemshavings.com

179 ms

www.gemshavings.com

437 ms

bootstrap.min.css

135 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

192 ms

normalize.min.css

236 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Gemshavings.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (437 ms) belongs to the original domain Gemshavings.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gemshavings.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 27.3 kB

  • Original 32.3 kB
  • After minification 21.1 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GEM Shavings images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 36.0 kB

  • Original 101.4 kB
  • After minification 101.0 kB
  • After compression 65.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

  • Original 40.6 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB
  • After compression 26.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gemshavings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.6 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (36%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GEM Shavings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gemshavings.com

gemshavings.com

179 ms

www.gemshavings.com

www.gemshavings.com

437 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

135 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.css

192 ms

normalize.min.css

normalize.min.css

236 ms

custom.min.css

custom.min.css

241 ms

css

css

28 ms

css

css

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

23 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

317 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

314 ms

productcarousel.js

productcarousel.js

314 ms

masonrygrid.js

masonrygrid.js

314 ms

panelfooter.js

panelfooter.js

317 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

100 ms

GEMShavings_LOGO.jpg

GEMShavings_LOGO.jpg

93 ms

HERO_HOME_horsewithwheat.jpg

HERO_HOME_horsewithwheat.jpg

188 ms

HERO_HOME_ArabianHorse.jpg

HERO_HOME_ArabianHorse.jpg

302 ms

HERO_HOME_horses1.jpg

HERO_HOME_horses1.jpg

261 ms

HERO_HOME_horse2.jpg

HERO_HOME_horse2.jpg

246 ms

PRODUCTS_WhiteShavingsAnimalBedding.jpg

PRODUCTS_WhiteShavingsAnimalBedding.jpg

246 ms

GemShavingsFacility_s.jpg

GemShavingsFacility_s.jpg

144 ms

GemShavingsWhites_Thumb_s.jpg

GemShavingsWhites_Thumb_s.jpg

196 ms

GemShavingsPine_Thumb_s.jpg

GemShavingsPine_Thumb_s.jpg

247 ms

GemShavingsCedar_Thumb_s.jpg

GemShavingsCedar_Thumb_s.jpg

259 ms

GemShavingsSmallFlake_Thumb_s.jpg

GemShavingsSmallFlake_Thumb_s.jpg

293 ms

GemShavingDouglasFir_Thumb_s.jpg

GemShavingDouglasFir_Thumb_s.jpg

293 ms

PRODUCTS_BulkShavings_thumb.jpg

PRODUCTS_BulkShavings_thumb.jpg

307 ms

SWAG_GemShavingsGoogleMap.jpg

SWAG_GemShavingsGoogleMap.jpg

387 ms

Icon_phone.png

Icon_phone.png

314 ms

Icon_email.png

Icon_email.png

350 ms

Icon_Location.png

Icon_Location.png

348 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

355 ms

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0g.woff

2sDfZG1Wl4LcnbuKjk0g.woff

46 ms

Z9XSDmdMWRiN1_T9Z7xaz_mLtro.woff

Z9XSDmdMWRiN1_T9Z7xaz_mLtro.woff

66 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

305 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

100 ms

Accessibility Review

gemshavings.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gemshavings.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gemshavings.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gemshavings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gemshavings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gemshavings.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GEM Shavings. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: