3.3 sec in total
552 ms
1.7 sec
1.1 sec
Visit genealogyjottings.com now to see the best up-to-date Genealogy Jottings content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about genealogyjottings.com
Visit genealogyjottings.comWe analyzed Genealogyjottings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 552 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
genealogyjottings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value250 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.111
87/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
552 ms
91 ms
140 ms
56 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Genealogyjottings.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 2% (1 request) were made to S.c.lnkd.licdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Genealogyjottings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 153.7 kB (39%)
394.4 kB
240.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Genealogyjottings.com main page is 394.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 225.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Genealogy Jottings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Genealogyjottings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (43%)
51
29
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Genealogy Jottings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
genealogyjottings.com
552 ms
script.js
91 ms
style.css
140 ms
anywhere.js
56 ms
widgets.js
57 ms
wp-embed.min.js
70 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
89 ms
btn_viewmy_120x33.png
57 ms
cropped-gblogo-e1360559038301.png
774 ms
7f04de1d92d51e01d1ccd1ce09cadef730a2deea_300x250-1.gif
769 ms
Page-BgTexture.jpg
747 ms
Page-BgGradient.jpg
748 ms
Sheet-c.png
749 ms
Header.jpg
780 ms
nav.png
750 ms
MenuItem.png
749 ms
BlockContent-s.png
751 ms
BlockContent-h.png
750 ms
BlockContent-v.png
779 ms
BlockContentBullets.png
778 ms
2.gif
779 ms
8.gif
778 ms
0.gif
777 ms
4.gif
802 ms
3.gif
826 ms
Button.png
800 ms
Post-s.png
826 ms
Post-h.png
797 ms
Post-v.png
798 ms
PostDateIcon.png
844 ms
PostAuthorIcon.png
844 ms
031916_0132_Genealogica1.png
850 ms
PostCategoryIcon.png
845 ms
PostCommentsIcon.png
849 ms
031016_1720_TheShermans1.png
871 ms
030616_2147_52Ancestors1.jpg
946 ms
030616_2147_52Ancestors2.png
940 ms
030216_1646_TwoGirlsNam1.jpg
941 ms
022516_1812_BackToTheNe1.jpg
941 ms
022216_1900_52Ancestors1.jpg
940 ms
022216_1900_52Ancestors2.jpg
941 ms
021816_1645_LifeGetsInt1.jpg
950 ms
PostBullets.png
946 ms
021316_2341_52Ancestors1.jpg
952 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
752 ms
021316_2341_52Ancestors2.jpg
924 ms
021216_1830_WhatWillHap1.png
247 ms
020416_1733_TheShermans1.jpg
259 ms
rssIcon.png
250 ms
Footer.png
255 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
42 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
110 ms
jot.html
31 ms
genealogyjottings.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
genealogyjottings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
genealogyjottings.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Genealogyjottings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Genealogyjottings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
genealogyjottings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Genealogy Jottings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: