3 sec in total
325 ms
883 ms
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing General Engineering content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about generalengineering.net
General Engineering Company is a Multidisciplinary consulting firm Focused on quality, reliability & innovation.
Visit generalengineering.netWe analyzed Generalengineering.net page load time and found that the first response time was 325 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
generalengineering.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value990 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.127
82/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
325 ms
21 ms
29 ms
41 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Generalengineering.net, 39% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pro.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (325 ms) belongs to the original domain Generalengineering.net.
Page size can be reduced by 53.2 kB (9%)
584.3 kB
531.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Generalengineering.net main page is 584.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 395.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 207 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Generalengineering.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (93%)
28
2
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of General Engineering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.generalengineering.net
325 ms
style.min.css
21 ms
autoptimize_single_2184be75459b6a41ec6c22640be495d2.css
29 ms
autoptimize_single_8df4a57b6505a91513d5bc2be7f88736.css
41 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
40 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
31 ms
jquery.json.min.js
34 ms
gravityforms.min.js
58 ms
api.js
34 ms
utils.min.js
74 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
74 ms
lazysizes.min.js
56 ms
css
56 ms
lity.min.css
72 ms
all.css
95 ms
lity.min.js
108 ms
core.min.js
94 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
108 ms
dom-ready.min.js
106 ms
hooks.min.js
116 ms
i18n.min.js
116 ms
a11y.min.js
117 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
118 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
118 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
118 ms
live.js
118 ms
css
31 ms
recaptcha__en.js
96 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbPpqMl8Kuo_Aw.woff
65 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbMJqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
64 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbMZqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
59 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbOpqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
59 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6G_TbM5qMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
63 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbPpqMl8Kuo_Aw.woff
66 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbMJqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
66 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbMZqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
65 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbOpqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
65 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6_PPbM5qMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
63 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbPpqMl8Kuo_Aw.woff
65 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbMJqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
95 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbMZqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
95 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbOpqMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
96 ms
qFda35WCmI96Ajtm83upeyoaX6QPnlo6ovPbM5qMl8Kuo_AwesE.woff
96 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJTVBNI4un_HKCEk.woff
97 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJTVPNI4un_HKCEl-Cw.woff
99 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7myRJTVFNI4un_HKCEl-Cw.woff
99 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JTVBNI4un_HKCEk.woff
99 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JTVPNI4un_HKCEl-Cw.woff
99 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mz9JTVFNI4un_HKCEl-Cw.woff
127 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IjVBNI4un_HKCEk.woff
126 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IjVPNI4un_HKCEl-Cw.woff
126 ms
92zPtBhPNqw79Ij1E865zBUv7mx9IjVFNI4un_HKCEl-Cw.woff
127 ms
fa-light-300.woff
57 ms
fa-light-300.woff
57 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
96 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
56 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
97 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
95 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
96 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
194 ms
generalengineering.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
generalengineering.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
generalengineering.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Generalengineering.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Generalengineering.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
generalengineering.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of General Engineering. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: