Tools & Wizards About Us
gepcom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

gepcom.com

GepCom:: South Florida web software developer, South Florida web software developer, South Florida web design, custom programming services, applicatio...

Page Load Speed

524 ms in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

316 ms

Page Rendered

100 ms

gepcom.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gepcom.com homepage info - get ready to check Gep Com best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about gepcom.com

Programming and marketing firm providing strategic technology solutions to clients around the world. We specialize in web design, site promotion, marketing, consulting, hosting and on-line ecommerce c...

Visit gepcom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gepcom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 416 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gepcom.com performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gepcom.com

108 ms

urchin.js

8 ms

style_1.css

51 ms

__utm.gif

5 ms

analytics.js

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Gepcom.com, 15% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (137 ms) belongs to the original domain Gepcom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.3 kB (37%)

Content Size

154.1 kB

After Optimization

97.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gepcom.com main page is 154.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 69.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

  • Original 23.3 kB
  • After minification 17.7 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.6 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 69.5 kB
  • After minification 66.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gep Com images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.3 kB
  • After compression 329 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gepcom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gep Com. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

gepcom.com

gepcom.com

108 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

8 ms

style_1.css

style_1.css

51 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

5 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

70 ms

gepcom_01.jpg

gepcom_01.jpg

70 ms

gepcom_02.jpg

gepcom_02.jpg

70 ms

gepcom_03.jpg

gepcom_03.jpg

70 ms

gepcom_05.jpg

gepcom_05.jpg

71 ms

gepcom_06.jpg

gepcom_06.jpg

72 ms

gepcom_07.jpg

gepcom_07.jpg

73 ms

gepcom_08.jpg

gepcom_08.jpg

71 ms

gepcom_09.jpg

gepcom_09.jpg

81 ms

gepcom_11.jpg

gepcom_11.jpg

84 ms

gepcom_13.jpg

gepcom_13.jpg

84 ms

gepcom_12.jpg

gepcom_12.jpg

84 ms

gepcom_10.jpg

gepcom_10.jpg

84 ms

gepcom_16.jpg

gepcom_16.jpg

87 ms

arrow.gif

arrow.gif

108 ms

home_title.jpg

home_title.jpg

110 ms

hr.jpg

hr.jpg

110 ms

dot.jpg

dot.jpg

111 ms

fg_customersvc.jpg

fg_customersvc.jpg

137 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

js

js

61 ms

Accessibility Review

gepcom.com accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

gepcom.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

gepcom.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gepcom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gepcom.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gepcom.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gep Com. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: