Tools & Wizards About Us
gerepair.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

gerepair.us

Gerepair

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

646 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

450 ms

gerepair.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gerepair content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gerepair.us

Visit gerepair.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Gerepair.us page load time and found that the first response time was 646 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gerepair.us performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.855

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gerepair.us

646 ms

css2

43 ms

css2

57 ms

css2

61 ms

jquery-ui.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Gerepair.us, 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (671 ms) belongs to the original domain Gerepair.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (24%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gerepair.us main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 32.3 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 567.6 kB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gerepair needs image optimization as it can save up to 567.6 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 188.0 kB

  • Original 270.8 kB
  • After minification 262.8 kB
  • After compression 82.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 223.6 kB

  • Original 274.4 kB
  • After minification 239.7 kB
  • After compression 50.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gerepair.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 223.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gerepair. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gerepair.us

gerepair.us

646 ms

css2

css2

43 ms

css2

css2

57 ms

css2

css2

61 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

27 ms

jquery-1.12.4.js

jquery-1.12.4.js

34 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

36 ms

styles.css

styles.css

58 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

213 ms

common-style.css

common-style.css

193 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

228 ms

css

css

59 ms

style.css

style.css

242 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

303 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

208 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

295 ms

functions.js

functions.js

253 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

259 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

298 ms

owl.carousel.show.js

owl.carousel.show.js

294 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

296 ms

public.css

public.css

358 ms

default.css

default.css

359 ms

index.js

index.js

359 ms

index.js

index.js

358 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

skip-link-focus-fix.min.js

358 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js

360 ms

css2

css2

16 ms

css2

css2

14 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

157 ms

icon_1.png

icon_1.png

70 ms

icon_2.png

icon_2.png

70 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

671 ms

banner_2.jpg

banner_2.jpg

125 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

255 ms

about_img_3.png

about_img_3.png

187 ms

icon_img_1.png

icon_img_1.png

108 ms

icon_img_3.png

icon_img_3.png

153 ms

icon_img_4.png

icon_img_4.png

177 ms

icon_img_5.png

icon_img_5.png

209 ms

icon_img_6.png

icon_img_6.png

207 ms

icon_img_2.png

icon_img_2.png

221 ms

client_img_1.png

client_img_1.png

241 ms

client_img_2.png

client_img_2.png

256 ms

client_img_4.png

client_img_4.png

461 ms

footer.jpg

footer.jpg

238 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

39 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

50 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

58 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

68 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

68 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

67 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

68 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUE.ttf

58 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUE.ttf

68 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUE.ttf

69 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUE.ttf

70 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

216 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNpXw.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNpXw.ttf

27 ms

Accessibility Review

gerepair.us accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gerepair.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gerepair.us SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gerepair.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gerepair.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gerepair.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gerepair. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: