Tools & Wizards About Us
gesintl.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

gesintl.in

Global Educational Services (Official Website) | International educational service provider - gesintl.in

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

531 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

gesintl.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gesintl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gesintl.in

Global Educational Services formerly known as Global Link Services is an International educational service provider that helps you reach out to hundreds of Universities / Colleges across the globe at ...

Visit gesintl.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Gesintl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gesintl.in performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gesintl.in

531 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

54 ms

style-university.css

256 ms

remixicon.css

54 ms

boxicons.min.css

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Gesintl.in, 19% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 18% (10 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (869 ms) belongs to the original domain Gesintl.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 272.6 kB (45%)

Content Size

601.4 kB

After Optimization

328.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gesintl.in main page is 601.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 387.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

  • Original 124.5 kB
  • After minification 84.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gesintl needs image optimization as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 221.5 kB

  • Original 387.8 kB
  • After minification 387.8 kB
  • After compression 166.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.5 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 81.5 kB
  • After minification 81.5 kB
  • After compression 76.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gesintl.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (70%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gesintl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gesintl.in

gesintl.in

531 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

54 ms

style-university.css

style-university.css

256 ms

remixicon.css

remixicon.css

54 ms

boxicons.min.css

boxicons.min.css

79 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

62 ms

line.css

line.css

74 ms

chat.css

chat.css

494 ms

style.css

style.css

512 ms

gsap.css

gsap.css

515 ms

jquery.rateyo.min.css

jquery.rateyo.min.css

69 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

57 ms

jquery.rateyo.min.js

jquery.rateyo.min.js

82 ms

lenis.min.js

lenis.min.js

66 ms

ScrollTrigger.min.js

ScrollTrigger.min.js

82 ms

ionicons.esm.js

ionicons.esm.js

64 ms

ionicons.js

ionicons.js

80 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

63 ms

script-university.js

script-university.js

617 ms

ionicons.esm.js

ionicons.esm.js

62 ms

ionicons.js

ionicons.js

75 ms

app.js

app.js

512 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

30 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

20 ms

css2

css2

28 ms

css2

css2

17 ms

iwKNs4JNvVw

iwKNs4JNvVw

194 ms

25431758

25431758

595 ms

back-image.png

back-image.png

869 ms

logo4.png

logo4.png

681 ms

student_1.webp

student_1.webp

680 ms

footer_background2.png

footer_background2.png

477 ms

wave_purple2.png

wave_purple2.png

477 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

36 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

52 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

69 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

69 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

62 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

62 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

68 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

59 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

68 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

17 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

34 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

19 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

4 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

28 ms

base.js

base.js

51 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

226 ms

zF_vPuIB9TmKXIhqGvs4Q-1RpaRIMS8epygYjX9fevg.js

zF_vPuIB9TmKXIhqGvs4Q-1RpaRIMS8epygYjX9fevg.js

92 ms

embed.js

embed.js

35 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

25 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

23 ms

Create

Create

105 ms

id

id

13 ms

widget.js

widget.js

226 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

15 ms

Accessibility Review

gesintl.in accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

gesintl.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gesintl.in SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gesintl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gesintl.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gesintl.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gesintl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: