2 sec in total
337 ms
1.4 sec
259 ms
Visit gettingmore.com now to see the best up-to-date Getting More content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gettingmore.com
Visit gettingmore.comWe analyzed Gettingmore.com page load time and found that the first response time was 337 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
gettingmore.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
84/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value1.334
0/100
15%
Value4.0 s
87/100
10%
337 ms
19 ms
30 ms
17 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Gettingmore.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (337 ms) belongs to the original domain Gettingmore.com.
Page size can be reduced by 621.6 kB (66%)
946.7 kB
325.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gettingmore.com main page is 946.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 465.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Getting More needs image optimization as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 310.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 238.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gettingmore.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 238.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (74%)
66
17
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Getting More. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gettingmore.com
337 ms
style.css
19 ms
jquery.js
30 ms
comment-reply.js
17 ms
buttons.js
9 ms
hoverIntent.js
17 ms
superfish.js
19 ms
supersubs.js
22 ms
facebox.js
22 ms
facebox.css
23 ms
reset.css
13 ms
typography.css
17 ms
2c-r-fixed.css
16 ms
images.css
18 ms
default.css
25 ms
plugins.css
24 ms
bg_container.png
19 ms
bg_content_top.png
23 ms
main_logo.png
19 ms
bg_content_mid.png
22 ms
bg_main_nav.png
20 ms
sn_rss.png
23 ms
sn_twitter.png
23 ms
sn_facebook.png
25 ms
sn_linkedin.png
25 ms
bg_top_mod_top.png
26 ms
bg_top_mod_mid.png
25 ms
GMPBACKSHADOW.jpg
34 ms
heading_homepage_about.png
27 ms
icon_read_more.png
29 ms
GMWEB1.jpg
54 ms
bg_top_mod_bottom.png
30 ms
IMG_1740-SD-lean2-small-300x200.jpg
22 ms
widget.js
79 ms
bg_side_mod_top.png
24 ms
bg_side_mod_mid.png
25 ms
heading_press_testimonials.png
27 ms
btn_download_rect.png
31 ms
bg_side_mod_bottom.png
28 ms
heading_homepage_blog.png
43 ms
SDTALK.jpg
44 ms
GMSMLER.jpg
16 ms
GMSTORE3.jpg
17 ms
eYchBNyPmyY
197 ms
heading_home_mod_email.png
14 ms
ga.js
6 ms
bg_input_text.png
132 ms
bg_content_bottom.png
132 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
242 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
43 ms
www-embed-player.js
61 ms
base.js
101 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
60 ms
ad_status.js
60 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
55 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
120 ms
getSegment.php
189 ms
checkOAuth.esi
114 ms
t.dhj
8 ms
t.dhj
20 ms
cm
57 ms
x35248
124 ms
s-3271.xgi
39 ms
hbpix
35 ms
8 ms
11 ms
xrefid.xgi
5 ms
gif
17 ms
gettingmore.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gettingmore.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gettingmore.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gettingmore.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gettingmore.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gettingmore.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Getting More. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: