Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

gfxcamp.com

龋齿一号GFXCamp|最新CG资源素材分享

Page Load Speed

10.4 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

8.5 sec

Page Rendered

686 ms

gfxcamp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gfxcamp.com homepage info - get ready to check Gfxcamp best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about gfxcamp.com

最新最热CG资源分享,龋齿一号GFXCamp,CG营地,视频素材,AE模板,CG教程,插件,软件

Visit gfxcamp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gfxcamp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 9.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gfxcamp.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gfxcamp.com

1230 ms

www.gfxcamp.com

1918 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

251 ms

wpfp.css

472 ms

style.min.css

886 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gfxcamp.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Gfxcamp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 184.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Gfxcamp.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 104.1 kB

  • Original 123.0 kB
  • After minification 116.1 kB
  • After compression 18.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 68.7 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gfxcamp images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 62.9 kB
  • After minification 62.9 kB
  • After compression 51.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gfxcamp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (29%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gfxcamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gfxcamp.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

gfxcamp.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

gfxcamp.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gfxcamp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gfxcamp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gfxcamp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: