Tools & Wizards About Us
ghostark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ghostark.com

GhostArc Ghost Hunting Gadget

Page Load Speed

777 ms in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

436 ms

Page Rendered

203 ms

ghostark.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ghostark.com now to see the best up-to-date Ghost Ark content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ghostark.com

GhostArc is the world's worst device for ghost seekers.

Visit ghostark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ghostark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 639 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ghostark.com performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ghostark.com

138 ms

site_global.css

55 ms

master_a-master.css

108 ms

index.css

109 ms

pasted%20image%20366x54.jpg

105 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ghostark.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (295 ms) belongs to the original domain Ghostark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

332.0 kB

After Optimization

279.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ghostark.com main page is 332.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 296.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 24.0 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 33.5 kB

  • Original 296.2 kB
  • After minification 262.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ghost Ark needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 206 B

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 7.6 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 82 B

  • Original 4.2 kB
  • After minification 4.2 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ghostark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ghost Ark. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

ghostark.com

ghostark.com

138 ms

site_global.css

site_global.css

55 ms

master_a-master.css

master_a-master.css

108 ms

index.css

index.css

109 ms

pasted%20image%20366x54.jpg

pasted%20image%20366x54.jpg

105 ms

pasted%20image%20227x65.jpg

pasted%20image%20227x65.jpg

106 ms

pasted%20image%201230x614.jpg

pasted%20image%201230x614.jpg

213 ms

pasted%20image%20765x599.jpg

pasted%20image%20765x599.jpg

155 ms

pasted%20image%201039x196.jpg

pasted%20image%201039x196.jpg

208 ms

pasted%20image%20139x117.jpg

pasted%20image%20139x117.jpg

159 ms

pasted%20image%20106x107.jpg

pasted%20image%20106x107.jpg

162 ms

pasted%20image%20104x107.jpg

pasted%20image%20104x107.jpg

161 ms

require.js

require.js

212 ms

pasted%20image%20112x108.jpg

pasted%20image%20112x108.jpg

214 ms

pasted%20image%20109x105.jpg

pasted%20image%20109x105.jpg

214 ms

pasted%20image%20106x104.jpg

pasted%20image%20106x104.jpg

216 ms

pasted%20image%20877x400.jpg

pasted%20image%20877x400.jpg

293 ms

pasted%20image%20621x853.jpg

pasted%20image%20621x853.jpg

294 ms

pasted%20image%20906x447.jpg

pasted%20image%20906x447.jpg

293 ms

pasted%20image%20271x58.jpg

pasted%20image%20271x58.jpg

295 ms

pasted%20image%20188x62.jpg

pasted%20image%20188x62.jpg

294 ms

museconfig.js

museconfig.js

77 ms

Accessibility Review

ghostark.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ghostark.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ghostark.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ghostark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ghostark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ghostark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ghost Ark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: