Tools & Wizards About Us
gi.ma screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 49

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

gi.ma

GI, Générale Intérim: Intérim, Travail Temporaire, Gestion des Ressources Humain, Recrutement, Conseil, Formation

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

221 ms

Resources Loaded

762 ms

Page Rendered

90 ms

gi.ma screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gi.ma homepage info - get ready to check GI best content right away, or after learning these important things about gi.ma

GI, Générale Intérim est née en 1997 d’une joint-venture entre GI France, société du GROUPE SOGICA-OLSTEN, 3ème groupe mondial des sociétés de Travail Temporaire, et de G.D Holding S.A., groupe privé ...

Visit gi.ma

Key Findings

We analyzed Gi.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 852 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gi.ma performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gi.ma

221 ms

skin.css

45 ms

stm31.js

80 ms

index_01.jpg

35 ms

index_02.jpg

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gi.ma and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) belongs to the original domain Gi.ma.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

341.5 kB

After Optimization

285.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gi.ma main page is 341.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 276.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 47.3 kB

  • Original 54.0 kB
  • After minification 49.7 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 276.2 kB
  • After minification 268.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GI images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 640 B

  • Original 9.9 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 439 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 949 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gi.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 439 B or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (27%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GI. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gi.ma

gi.ma

221 ms

skin.css

skin.css

45 ms

stm31.js

stm31.js

80 ms

index_01.jpg

index_01.jpg

35 ms

index_02.jpg

index_02.jpg

35 ms

index_03.jpg

index_03.jpg

120 ms

index_04.jpg

index_04.jpg

118 ms

index_05.jpg

index_05.jpg

136 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

116 ms

gi.jpg

gi.jpg

119 ms

gi-ov.jpg

gi-ov.jpg

151 ms

arrow_r.gif

arrow_r.gif

150 ms

menu_02.jpg

menu_02.jpg

163 ms

ec_cand.jpg

ec_cand.jpg

178 ms

ec_cand-ov.jpg

ec_cand-ov.jpg

157 ms

esp_ent.jpg

esp_ent.jpg

179 ms

esp_ent-ov.jpg

esp_ent-ov.jpg

182 ms

act.jpg

act.jpg

185 ms

act-ov.jpg

act-ov.jpg

196 ms

telechg.jpg

telechg.jpg

195 ms

telechg-ov.jpg

telechg-ov.jpg

210 ms

cont.jpg

cont.jpg

211 ms

cont-ov.jpg

cont-ov.jpg

215 ms

menu_03.jpg

menu_03.jpg

219 ms

index_07.jpg

index_07.jpg

238 ms

index_08.jpg

index_08.jpg

238 ms

index_11.jpg

index_11.jpg

242 ms

index_12.jpg

index_12.jpg

243 ms

activite_01.jpg

activite_01.jpg

255 ms

img1.jpg

img1.jpg

256 ms

img2.jpg

img2.jpg

271 ms

img3.jpg

img3.jpg

302 ms

img4.jpg

img4.jpg

317 ms

prd_sces.jpg

prd_sces.jpg

287 ms

puce2.jpg

puce2.jpg

288 ms

actualites.jpg

actualites.jpg

303 ms

puce1.jpg

puce1.jpg

305 ms

tt_actu.jpg

tt_actu.jpg

330 ms

bgb.jpg

bgb.jpg

321 ms

newsletter.jpg

newsletter.jpg

305 ms

ok.jpg

ok.jpg

308 ms

recherche.jpg

recherche.jpg

226 ms

esp_candidat.jpg

esp_candidat.jpg

242 ms

esp_entrse.jpg

esp_entrse.jpg

242 ms

index_16.jpg

index_16.jpg

250 ms

index_17.jpg

index_17.jpg

237 ms

index_19.jpg

index_19.jpg

227 ms

index_20.jpg

index_20.jpg

226 ms

index_21.jpg

index_21.jpg

247 ms

index_22.jpg

index_22.jpg

232 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

226 ms

Accessibility Review

gi.ma accessibility score

49

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

gi.ma best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gi.ma SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gi.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Gi.ma main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gi.ma

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GI. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: