Tools & Wizards About Us
giantsteeth.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 84% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

giantsteeth.com

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

745 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

348 ms

giantsteeth.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Giantsteeth content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about giantsteeth.com

Visit giantsteeth.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Giantsteeth.com page load time and found that the first response time was 745 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giantsteeth.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.giantsteeth.com

745 ms

style.css

171 ms

modernizr.custom.63321.js

58 ms

jquery.min.js

8 ms

socialite.min.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Giantsteeth.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (745 ms) belongs to the original domain Giantsteeth.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

820.0 kB

After Optimization

738.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Giantsteeth.com main page is 820.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 693.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 37.9 kB

  • Original 45.8 kB
  • After minification 45.8 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 693.4 kB
  • After minification 693.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Giantsteeth images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 49.2 kB
  • After minification 49.1 kB
  • After compression 29.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 31.6 kB
  • After minification 31.0 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giantsteeth.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (59%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giantsteeth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.giantsteeth.com

www.giantsteeth.com

745 ms

style.css

style.css

171 ms

modernizr.custom.63321.js

modernizr.custom.63321.js

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

8 ms

socialite.min.js

socialite.min.js

69 ms

wpsocialite.js

wpsocialite.js

34 ms

jquery.hotkeys.min.js

jquery.hotkeys.min.js

73 ms

shortcuts.js

shortcuts.js

9 ms

gestures.js

gestures.js

10 ms

infinite.js

infinite.js

18 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

22 ms

script.js

script.js

57 ms

jquery.dropdown.js

jquery.dropdown.js

34 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

67 ms

ga.js

ga.js

60 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

41 ms

combined.jpg

combined.jpg

97 ms

descent.jpg

descent.jpg

110 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

71 ms

54 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

26 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

43 ms

mobile-style.css

mobile-style.css

11 ms

Accessibility Review

giantsteeth.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

giantsteeth.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

giantsteeth.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giantsteeth.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giantsteeth.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

giantsteeth.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Giantsteeth. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: