Tools & Wizards About Us
gidonline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

gidonline.com

Gujarat Industries Directory, Indian Manufacturers, Suppliers

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

125 ms

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

458 ms

gidonline.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gidonline content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gidonline.com

Gujarat Industries Directory, Free Online Business Directory, Yellow Pages, B2B Portal, Find Indian Manufacturers, Suppliers, Dealers and Exporters of Industrial Products and Services, Mechanical Engi...

Visit gidonline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gidonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gidonline.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gidonline.com

125 ms

www.gujaratdirectory.com

171 ms

www.gujaratdirectory.com

290 ms

autodata.css

79 ms

bootstrap.min.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gidonline.com, 53% (49 requests) were made to Gujaratdirectory.com and 27% (25 requests) were made to Midassets.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Midassets.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 558.4 kB (58%)

Content Size

962.1 kB

After Optimization

403.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gidonline.com main page is 962.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 368.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 333.5 kB

  • Original 368.6 kB
  • After minification 253.8 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 114.8 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 333.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 72.0 kB

  • Original 166.0 kB
  • After minification 94.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gidonline needs image optimization as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 53.5 kB

  • Original 217.1 kB
  • After minification 217.0 kB
  • After compression 163.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 99.4 kB

  • Original 210.5 kB
  • After minification 210.5 kB
  • After compression 111.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gidonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 99.4 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (52%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

43

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gidonline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gidonline.com

gidonline.com

125 ms

www.gujaratdirectory.com

www.gujaratdirectory.com

171 ms

www.gujaratdirectory.com

www.gujaratdirectory.com

290 ms

autodata.css

autodata.css

79 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

114 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

154 ms

animate.css

animate.css

156 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

160 ms

jquery.bxslider.css

jquery.bxslider.css

152 ms

main-styles.css

main-styles.css

203 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

167 ms

w3.css

w3.css

185 ms

bootstrap-social.css

bootstrap-social.css

183 ms

card-form.css

card-form.css

183 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

189 ms

theme.css

theme.css

260 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

56 ms

sweetalert.css

sweetalert.css

213 ms

validate_style.css

validate_style.css

211 ms

css

css

57 ms

css

css

73 ms

icon

icon

80 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

64 ms

detail-media.css

detail-media.css

210 ms

style.css

style.css

219 ms

js

js

72 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

202 ms

additional-methods.min.js

additional-methods.min.js

211 ms

bounce.js

bounce.js

213 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

212 ms

cust-ausearch.js

cust-ausearch.js

220 ms

custom.js

custom.js

370 ms

star.js

star.js

371 ms

cust-bso.js

cust-bso.js

371 ms

cust-csms.js

cust-csms.js

370 ms

cust-ss.js

cust-ss.js

372 ms

cust-adver.js

cust-adver.js

371 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

372 ms

libs.js

libs.js

373 ms

moment.js

moment.js

374 ms

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js

373 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

456 ms

application.js

application.js

456 ms

sweetalert.min.js

sweetalert.min.js

455 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

86 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

190 ms

click-large-2.png

click-large-2.png

295 ms

GID_logo.png

GID_logo.png

188 ms

mech.svg

mech.svg

186 ms

electrical.svg

electrical.svg

186 ms

mechinery.svg

mechinery.svg

211 ms

chemicals.svg

chemicals.svg

212 ms

Metallurgical.svg

Metallurgical.svg

209 ms

Plastic.svg

Plastic.svg

213 ms

services-to-industry.svg

services-to-industry.svg

210 ms

package.svg

package.svg

212 ms

mech.png

mech.png

758 ms

electrical.png

electrical.png

758 ms

mechinery.png

mechinery.png

774 ms

chemicals.png

chemicals.png

774 ms

Metallurgical.png

Metallurgical.png

773 ms

Plastic.png

Plastic.png

773 ms

services-to-industry.png

services-to-industry.png

774 ms

package.png

package.png

773 ms

vashinew.webp

vashinew.webp

851 ms

punenew.webp

punenew.webp

912 ms

close-popup.png

close-popup.png

1224 ms

gid-popup.png

gid-popup.png

1535 ms

industry-back-final.jpg

industry-back-final.jpg

702 ms

font

font

41 ms

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

fontawesome-webfont5b62.woff

105 ms

collect

collect

25 ms

collect

collect

553 ms

js

js

418 ms

10

10

646 ms

391 ms

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

199 ms

arrow-left.png

arrow-left.png

138 ms

arrow-right.png

arrow-right.png

126 ms

36 ms

0

0

140 ms

livechat.png

livechat.png

1311 ms

mid-feedback.jpg

mid-feedback.jpg

655 ms

contact-us.png

contact-us.png

631 ms

c-care.png

c-care.png

449 ms

buy-direcory.svg

buy-direcory.svg

902 ms

testimonial-icon.png

testimonial-icon.png

641 ms

download-app.png

download-app.png

540 ms

playstore-icon.jpg

playstore-icon.jpg

1007 ms

applestore-icon.jpg

applestore-icon.jpg

1090 ms

join-now.png

join-now.png

1447 ms

login.png

login.png

1550 ms

Accessibility Review

gidonline.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gidonline.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gidonline.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gidonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gidonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gidonline.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gidonline. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: