5.6 sec in total
409 ms
4 sec
1.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Gidra Box content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gidrabox.ru
Купить оборудование для выращивания растений в гроубоксе по выгодной цене в Москве. Заказать готовые гроубоксы на сайте GidraBox.ru
Visit gidrabox.ruWe analyzed Gidrabox.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 409 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
gidrabox.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.4 s
27/100
10%
Value1,960 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.086
93/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
409 ms
1076 ms
49 ms
264 ms
399 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Gidrabox.ru, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gidrabox.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 572.6 kB (47%)
1.2 MB
645.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Gidrabox.ru main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 557.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 305.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 305.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 223.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gidrabox.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 223.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (73%)
37
10
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gidra Box. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gidrabox.ru
409 ms
gidrabox.ru
1076 ms
css2
49 ms
megashop.vendors.min.css
264 ms
megashop.min.css
399 ms
megashop.shop.min.css
535 ms
user.css
411 ms
frontend_nav.css
409 ms
grouped_brands.css
410 ms
megashop.head.min.js
550 ms
megashop.vendors.min.js
666 ms
fontawesome.js
548 ms
solid.js
1132 ms
megashop.min.js
680 ms
megashop.shop.min.js
668 ms
user.js
668 ms
flexdiscountFrontend.min.js
669 ms
jquery.cookie.js
819 ms
frontend.bundle.js
822 ms
frontend.bundle.css
821 ms
buy1click.css
820 ms
style__.css
822 ms
frontend.bundle.js
934 ms
buy1click.js
934 ms
style.pravki.css
935 ms
megashop.symbol-sprite.js
1086 ms
style.css
1088 ms
scripts.js
1118 ms
tag.js
1046 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
collect
13 ms
js
69 ms
megashop.symbol-sprite.svg
294 ms
logo.svg
292 ms
icon.sprite.svg
299 ms
48904900371
725 ms
megashop.shop.css-sprite.svg
191 ms
footer_logo.svg
189 ms
advert.gif
684 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
146 ms
gidrabox.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gidrabox.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gidrabox.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gidrabox.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gidrabox.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gidrabox.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gidra Box. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: