6.9 sec in total
2.7 sec
3.9 sec
269 ms
Welcome to gifse.in homepage info - get ready to check Gifse best content right away, or after learning these important things about gifse.in
GIFSE Since commencing in 2011, GIFSE has trained more than 1,000 professionals in a wide range of Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Management.
Visit gifse.inWe analyzed Gifse.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
gifse.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value25.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.166
71/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
2739 ms
197 ms
120 ms
242 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Gifse.in, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gifse.in.
Page size can be reduced by 206.3 kB (15%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Gifse.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 778.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gifse images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 74.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.1 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gifse.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (88%)
67
8
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gifse. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gifse.in
2739 ms
style.min.css
197 ms
chaty-front.min.css
120 ms
js_composer.min.css
242 ms
bootstrap.min.css
123 ms
base.min.css
135 ms
footer-widget-collapse.min.css
135 ms
footer-base.min.css
183 ms
opt-lazy-load.min.css
189 ms
wp-gutenberg.min.css
214 ms
wpb-int-mc4wp.min.css
207 ms
int-revolution-slider.min.css
256 ms
int-wpbakery-base.min.css
257 ms
style.css
256 ms
header-base.min.css
279 ms
mod-tools.min.css
286 ms
header-el-base.min.css
301 ms
el-social-icons.min.css
307 ms
page-title.min.css
321 ms
el-section-title.min.css
320 ms
el-responsive-text.min.css
344 ms
wpb-el-banner.min.css
357 ms
el-info-box.min.css
363 ms
opt-scrolltotop.min.css
369 ms
opt-header-banner.min.css
383 ms
opt-promo-popup.min.css
386 ms
lib-magnific-popup.min.css
415 ms
opt-sticky-social.min.css
431 ms
xts-header_715004-1632603921.css
424 ms
xts-theme_settings_default-1632603427.css
429 ms
css
34 ms
jquery.min.js
516 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
456 ms
device.min.js
481 ms
css
18 ms
font-awesome.css
433 ms
v4-shims.min.css
438 ms
all.min.css
449 ms
animate.min.css
511 ms
rs6.css
453 ms
cht-front-script.min.js
452 ms
picmo-umd.min.js
528 ms
picmo-latest-umd.min.js
468 ms
rbtools.min.js
491 ms
rs6.min.js
573 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
465 ms
cookie.min.js
456 ms
helpers.min.js
460 ms
woocommerceNotices.min.js
451 ms
headerBuilder.min.js
449 ms
menuOffsets.min.js
449 ms
menuSetUp.min.js
476 ms
lazyLoading.min.js
718 ms
waypoints.min.js
463 ms
animationsOffset.min.js
451 ms
footer.min.js
462 ms
scrollTop.min.js
481 ms
mobileNavigation.min.js
494 ms
headerBanner.min.js
470 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
471 ms
promoPopup.min.js
469 ms
stickySocialButtons.min.js
509 ms
image_processing.gif
674 ms
Gifse-logo.jpg
338 ms
dummy.png
354 ms
payments.png
366 ms
offer.jpg
624 ms
woodmart-font.woff
395 ms
font
59 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
284 ms
gifse.in accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gifse.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
gifse.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gifse.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gifse.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gifse.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gifse. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: