4.3 sec in total
863 ms
3.1 sec
290 ms
Click here to check amazing Gigant M content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gigant-m.ru
ООО Торговый дом Гигант поставщик металлообрабатывающих станков и кузнечно- прессового оборудования.
Visit gigant-m.ruWe analyzed Gigant-m.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 863 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
gigant-m.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.509
15/100
15%
Value13.0 s
12/100
10%
863 ms
376 ms
492 ms
223 ms
224 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Gigant-m.ru, 18% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Counter.megagroup.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Client.onicon.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 309.8 kB (35%)
894.8 kB
585.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gigant-m.ru main page is 894.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 526.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 173.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gigant M needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 86.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.5 kB or 16% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gigant-m.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.1 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (89%)
45
5
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gigant M. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gigant-m.ru
863 ms
jquery.min.js
376 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
492 ms
slick.css
223 ms
styles_articles_tpl.css
224 ms
lightgallery.min.css
225 ms
lightgallery.proxy.to.hs.min.css
225 ms
lightgallery.proxy.to.hs.stub.min.js
335 ms
lightgallery.proxy.to.hs.js
336 ms
ru.js
387 ms
common.min.js
336 ms
calendar.css
446 ms
user.css
570 ms
user.blue.css
448 ms
user.js
488 ms
theme.less.css
575 ms
printme.js
557 ms
tpl.js
558 ms
baron.min.js
594 ms
shop2.2.js
638 ms
theme.scss.css
904 ms
global_styles.css
670 ms
addons_site.scss.css
681 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
581 ms
s3.form.js
595 ms
jquery.formstyler.min.js
645 ms
jquery.ui.touch_punch.min.js
677 ms
slick.min.js
704 ms
jquery.responsiveTabs.min.js
691 ms
flexmenu.min.js
702 ms
modernizr.custom.js
754 ms
lightgallery.min.js
812 ms
lazyload.min.js
813 ms
main.js
915 ms
flexFix.js
823 ms
site.min.js
938 ms
663f64a3b887ee96238b4574.js
720 ms
defender.min.js
932 ms
spacer.gif
398 ms
css
31 ms
pattern.png
148 ms
patern2.png
148 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
97 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
135 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
149 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
154 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
168 ms
loader.js
476 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
37 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
22 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
36 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
37 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
37 ms
visitor.js
1128 ms
api.js
110 ms
1dd1b9bd0b4dc12869989e90dfb3c339.js
110 ms
gigant-m.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gigant-m.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
gigant-m.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gigant-m.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Gigant-m.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gigant-m.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gigant M. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: