Tools & Wizards About Us
gigatrak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

gigatrak.com

Tool Tracking System & Asset Management Software | GigaTrak

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

349 ms

gigatrak.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gigatrak.com now to see the best up-to-date Giga Trak content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gigatrak.com

GigaTrak tool tracking system makes asset management software using barcodes for inventory control of asset tracking with our cloud based solution.

Visit gigatrak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gigatrak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gigatrak.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gigatrak.com

1650 ms

css

37 ms

7qv8z.css

200 ms

7qv8z.css

250 ms

7qv8z.css

192 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Gigatrak.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gigatrak.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.3 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gigatrak.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 804.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 84.2 kB

  • Original 105.4 kB
  • After minification 91.8 kB
  • After compression 21.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 78.3 kB

  • Original 804.9 kB
  • After minification 726.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Giga Trak images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 338.2 kB
  • After minification 338.2 kB
  • After compression 319.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 280 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (63%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giga Trak. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.gigatrak.com

www.gigatrak.com

1650 ms

css

css

37 ms

7qv8z.css

7qv8z.css

200 ms

7qv8z.css

7qv8z.css

250 ms

7qv8z.css

7qv8z.css

192 ms

7qv8z.css

7qv8z.css

188 ms

7qv8z.css

7qv8z.css

253 ms

7qv8z.css

7qv8z.css

191 ms

7qv8z.css

7qv8z.css

252 ms

7qv8z.js

7qv8z.js

433 ms

js

js

73 ms

js

js

117 ms

ldc.js

ldc.js

121 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

204 ms

css

css

22 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

96 ms

avia.js

avia.js

203 ms

shortcodes.js

shortcodes.js

241 ms

contact.js

contact.js

243 ms

slideshow.js

slideshow.js

243 ms

gallery.js

gallery.js

241 ms

iconlist.js

iconlist.js

251 ms

menu.js

menu.js

303 ms

slideshow-video.js

slideshow-video.js

301 ms

tab_section.js

tab_section.js

300 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

301 ms

toggles.js

toggles.js

309 ms

video.js

video.js

359 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

360 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

363 ms

index.js

index.js

361 ms

collapse.js

collapse.js

474 ms

wpcf7r-fe.js

wpcf7r-fe.js

474 ms

avia-snippet-hamburger-menu.js

avia-snippet-hamburger-menu.js

475 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

476 ms

avia-snippet-lightbox.js

avia-snippet-lightbox.js

475 ms

avia-snippet-megamenu.js

avia-snippet-megamenu.js

476 ms

avia-snippet-sticky-header.js

avia-snippet-sticky-header.js

477 ms

avia-snippet-footer-effects.js

avia-snippet-footer-effects.js

482 ms

avia-snippet-widget.js

avia-snippet-widget.js

483 ms

api.js

api.js

43 ms

index.js

index.js

482 ms

ldc.js

ldc.js

41 ms

gigatrak-logo.png

gigatrak-logo.png

75 ms

gt-home-inventory-2.jpg

gt-home-inventory-2.jpg

195 ms

cloud_hosted_inventory_tracking.jpg

cloud_hosted_inventory_tracking.jpg

160 ms

self_hosted_inventory_tracking.jpg

self_hosted_inventory_tracking.jpg

194 ms

document-tracking-system-dts.jpg

document-tracking-system-dts.jpg

156 ms

package-tracking-system-feature.jpg

package-tracking-system-feature.jpg

193 ms

guard-tour-tracking-system-gts.jpg

guard-tour-tracking-system-gts.jpg

158 ms

barcode_tracking_software_250.png

barcode_tracking_software_250.png

344 ms

reviews-gt.png

reviews-gt.png

194 ms

font

font

83 ms

arrow-down.png

arrow-down.png

111 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

185 ms

111 ms

ss-bg1.jpg

ss-bg1.jpg

301 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

75 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

75 ms

logo-3.png

logo-3.png

154 ms

logo-4.png

logo-4.png

153 ms

logo-6.png

logo-6.png

155 ms

logo-7.png

logo-7.png

244 ms

logo-8.png

logo-8.png

244 ms

tm-logo-1.jpg

tm-logo-1.jpg

245 ms

arrow-so.png

arrow-so.png

175 ms

180130025553chalkmars.woff

180130025553chalkmars.woff

175 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

109 ms

87 ms

Accessibility Review

gigatrak.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

gigatrak.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gigatrak.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gigatrak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gigatrak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gigatrak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Giga Trak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: