Tools & Wizards About Us
gillinghamfootballclub.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

gillinghamfootballclub.com

Gillingham Football Club

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

225 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

489 ms

gillinghamfootballclub.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gillinghamfootballclub.com homepage info - get ready to check Gillingham Football Club best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about gillinghamfootballclub.com

The official website of Gillingham Football Club

Visit gillinghamfootballclub.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gillinghamfootballclub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gillinghamfootballclub.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gillinghamfootballclub.com

225 ms

www.gillinghamfootballclub.com

45 ms

epi-cookiepro

25 ms

otSDKStub.js

50 ms

gillingham

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Gillinghamfootballclub.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Dve-images.imggaming.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn-ukwest.onetrust.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) belongs to the original domain Gillinghamfootballclub.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 155.3 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Gillinghamfootballclub.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 124.5 kB

  • Original 164.1 kB
  • After minification 150.0 kB
  • After compression 39.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gillingham Football Club images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 542 B

  • Original 256.4 kB
  • After minification 256.4 kB
  • After compression 255.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (34%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gillingham Football Club. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.gillinghamfootballclub.com

www.gillinghamfootballclub.com

225 ms

www.gillinghamfootballclub.com

www.gillinghamfootballclub.com

45 ms

epi-cookiepro

epi-cookiepro

25 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

50 ms

gillingham

gillingham

38 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

377 ms

vendor-js

vendor-js

116 ms

common-js

common-js

44 ms

header-js

header-js

44 ms

blackout-js

blackout-js

337 ms

NewsArticle-js

NewsArticle-js

45 ms

embed.min.js

embed.min.js

43 ms

find.js

find.js

36 ms

0ace82d6-1ce5-4049-ac17-664044807913.json

0ace82d6-1ce5-4049-ac17-664044807913.json

301 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

332 ms

ZO1cRaSDv8uUDqr1ch8FxXaxdoWOSrZD-1595864345192.jpg

ZO1cRaSDv8uUDqr1ch8FxXaxdoWOSrZD-1595864345192.jpg

318 ms

GJO19W3RXBOVbSXwKwMiWHIAasxv6zdF-1595937145285.jpg

GJO19W3RXBOVbSXwKwMiWHIAasxv6zdF-1595937145285.jpg

300 ms

uBGUnTDTNEEUZ93IyOFx34XRuGnn4tuS-1621519837950.jpeg

uBGUnTDTNEEUZ93IyOFx34XRuGnn4tuS-1621519837950.jpeg

300 ms

FkVDs1Zxe995ZpOaOde1JpPbY6qIs4da-1595688636647.jpeg

FkVDs1Zxe995ZpOaOde1JpPbY6qIs4da-1595688636647.jpeg

301 ms

efl_watermark_logos_cropped_gillingham.png

efl_watermark_logos_cropped_gillingham.png

264 ms

gillingham.png

gillingham.png

251 ms

2021-sky-bet-l2-pendant.png

2021-sky-bet-l2-pendant.png

251 ms

Medium

Medium

265 ms

Small

Small

397 ms

Small

Small

263 ms

Small

Small

290 ms

Large

Large

294 ms

twitter-default-background-desktop.jpg

twitter-default-background-desktop.jpg

398 ms

Medium

Medium

397 ms

Medium

Medium

433 ms

Medium

Medium

432 ms

Medium

Medium

614 ms

Medium

Medium

501 ms

Medium

Medium

510 ms

Medium

Medium

522 ms

Medium

Medium

563 ms

EFL_Watermark_Logos_Full_Gillingham.png

EFL_Watermark_Logos_Full_Gillingham.png

444 ms

563 ms

Small

Small

649 ms

ai.0.js

ai.0.js

248 ms

open-sans-v36-latin-regular.ttf

open-sans-v36-latin-regular.ttf

458 ms

open-sans-v36-latin-600.ttf

open-sans-v36-latin-600.ttf

437 ms

open-sans-v36-latin-700.ttf

open-sans-v36-latin-700.ttf

491 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

503 ms

location

location

51 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

44 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

29 ms

Accessibility Review

gillinghamfootballclub.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

gillinghamfootballclub.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gillinghamfootballclub.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gillinghamfootballclub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gillinghamfootballclub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gillinghamfootballclub.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gillingham Football Club. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: