3 sec in total
436 ms
2 sec
600 ms
Click here to check amazing Gilmac content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gilmac.com
Other firms have cases. We have clients. Call 617-580-3180 to schedule a consultation with an attorney at Gilman, McLaughlin & Hanrahan, LLP, in Boston.
Visit gilmac.comWe analyzed Gilmac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 436 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
gilmac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value1.8 s
98/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value7.5 s
48/100
10%
436 ms
361 ms
140 ms
341 ms
93 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Gilmac.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Attorneys.findlaw.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (436 ms) belongs to the original domain Gilmac.com.
Page size can be reduced by 150.9 kB (39%)
388.8 kB
237.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Gilmac.com main page is 388.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 139.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 107.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gilmac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 31% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (23%)
22
17
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gilmac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gilmac.com
436 ms
brand.png
361 ms
menu-icon.png
140 ms
311d850e9baf09af3e3261cd129d961510a97ef12440ebc53a55c72b2c80e29a.js
341 ms
launch-4b8eab27482e.min.js
93 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
135 ms
bg-banner-wrap-home-updated.jpg
203 ms
icon-prac1.png
224 ms
icon-prac2.png
147 ms
icon-prac3.png
168 ms
icon-prac4.png
200 ms
icon-prac5.png
211 ms
icon-prac6.png
336 ms
bg-content-second-wrap.jpg
366 ms
badge1.png
337 ms
badge2.png
351 ms
bg-contact-info-wrap.jpg
365 ms
icon1.png
353 ms
id
44 ms
EX3c3542d266c4483894170527bc8a6430-libraryCode_source.min.js
53 ms
AppMeasurement_Module_AudienceManagement.min.js
59 ms
invoca.js
64 ms
datadog-rum-v5.js
45 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
139 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
97 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
123 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
142 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
155 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
159 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
244 ms
modules.woff
268 ms
modules.woff
254 ms
s7712380765471
37 ms
css
325 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf
82 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
110 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
64 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzcXKMny.ttf
103 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
76 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf
74 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
159 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K3vXBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
209 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32KxfXBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
183 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nXBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
338 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nWBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
300 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K5fQBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
193 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K67QBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
222 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K8nQBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
337 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K-DQBi8Jo43ZKyHqQg.ttf
291 ms
gilmac.com accessibility score
gilmac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gilmac.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gilmac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gilmac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gilmac.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gilmac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: