1.6 sec in total
57 ms
1.3 sec
253 ms
Click here to check amazing Gintg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gintg.com
Visit gintg.comWe analyzed Gintg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
gintg.com performance score
57 ms
24 ms
9 ms
20 ms
12 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Gintg.com, 16% (15 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (395 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 634.9 kB (5%)
13.8 MB
13.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Gintg.com main page is 13.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.8 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gintg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 393.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 393.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gintg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (46%)
83
45
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gintg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gintg.com
57 ms
layout.css
24 ms
iconic.css
9 ms
menu.css
20 ms
sidemenu.css
12 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
10 ms
beaverslider.js
46 ms
beaverslider-effects.js
46 ms
logging.js
5 ms
css
23 ms
navi.css
6 ms
homepage.css
6 ms
forms.css
8 ms
tables.css
6 ms
denim.png
33 ms
embed
54 ms
gig.png
29 ms
templatemo_header_wrapper.jpg
7 ms
UAE.png
20 ms
Saudi%20Arabia.png
12 ms
Venezuela.png
8 ms
Sweden.png
11 ms
Singapore.png
9 ms
Hong%20Kong.png
23 ms
Indonesia.png
13 ms
Switzerland.png
12 ms
Malaysia.png
18 ms
India.png
19 ms
our_websites.gif
31 ms
banner1.png
53 ms
banner2.png
68 ms
banner2-2.png
61 ms
banner3.png
83 ms
banner3-2.png
66 ms
banner4.png
74 ms
banner4-2.png
96 ms
banner5.png
84 ms
banner5-2.png
92 ms
banner6.png
111 ms
banner6-2.png
95 ms
banner7.png
111 ms
banner7-2.png
109 ms
banner8.png
121 ms
banner8-3.png
120 ms
banner8-4.png
139 ms
banner8-2.png
133 ms
banner9.png
142 ms
banner9-2.png
143 ms
banner10.png
160 ms
banner10-2.png
148 ms
banner19.png
169 ms
banner20.png
173 ms
banner18.png
147 ms
banner13.png
174 ms
banner14.png
170 ms
banner15.png
159 ms
embed
395 ms
rs=ABjfnFWG0j3zhtsZ1FCMy39vp-nQopMVGw
44 ms
css
75 ms
js
100 ms
rs=ABjfnFVj2c6_lUpgxbr93j8J5XcedEcimw
58 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
148 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
154 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
156 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
158 ms
rs=ABjfnFVj2c6_lUpgxbr93j8J5XcedEcimw
63 ms
common.js
70 ms
map.js
89 ms
overlay.js
127 ms
util.js
124 ms
marker.js
122 ms
geocoder.js
107 ms
controls.js
107 ms
places_impl.js
106 ms
selection_2x-000.png
32 ms
gen204
62 ms
onion.js
26 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
66 ms
stats.js
49 ms
transparent.png
94 ms
kh
109 ms
mapcnt6.png
42 ms
tmapctrl4.png
23 ms
vt
11 ms
vt
36 ms
viewer-icons001.png
76 ms
star4.png
96 ms
gen204
103 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
66 ms
MyMaps_Icons003.png
39 ms
mymaps_32.png
39 ms
v1_4593b7d7.png
44 ms
google-my-maps-logo-small-001.png
44 ms
gintg.com SEO score
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gintg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gintg.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
gintg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gintg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: