Tools & Wizards About Us
gintonic.dk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

gintonic.dk

Verdens Bedste Gin Tonic? Her er vores bud på den bedste Gin og Tonic!

Page Load Speed

10.2 sec in total

First Response

884 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

3.7 sec

gintonic.dk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gin Tonic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gintonic.dk

Vi elsker Gin og Tonic. Vi har lavet denne side for at hylde den gode klassiske cocktail. Her får du inspiration og vores bud på den bedste Gin Tonic!

Visit gintonic.dk

Key Findings

We analyzed Gintonic.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 884 ms and then it took 9.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gintonic.dk performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.799

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gintonic.dk

884 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

95 ms

rgs.css

185 ms

font-awesome.min.css

211 ms

style.css

362 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Gintonic.dk, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Gintonic.dk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gintonic.dk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 72.0 kB

  • Original 88.1 kB
  • After minification 86.1 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gin Tonic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 41.8 kB

  • Original 183.7 kB
  • After minification 183.7 kB
  • After compression 141.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 41.8 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 121.1 kB
  • After minification 121.1 kB
  • After compression 104.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gintonic.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gin Tonic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.gintonic.dk

www.gintonic.dk

884 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

95 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

185 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

211 ms

style.css

style.css

362 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

181 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

284 ms

css

css

75 ms

ascend.css

ascend.css

191 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

251 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

357 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

273 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

301 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

321 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

338 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

1248 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

1249 ms

wp-a11y.min.js

wp-a11y.min.js

1248 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

1249 ms

wpss-search-suggest.js

wpss-search-suggest.js

1250 ms

prettyPhoto.js

prettyPhoto.js

1250 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

1237 ms

init.js

init.js

1252 ms

nectar-slider.js

nectar-slider.js

1251 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1249 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1249 ms

www.gintonic.dk

www.gintonic.dk

340 ms

41.jpg

41.jpg

270 ms

40.jpg

40.jpg

267 ms

44.jpg

44.jpg

250 ms

Geranium-min.jpg

Geranium-min.jpg

296 ms

37.jpg

37.jpg

248 ms

51.jpg

51.jpg

251 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

1634 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

1637 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

1637 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

1636 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

1638 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

1635 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

1638 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

1640 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

1633 ms

diagonal_line.png

diagonal_line.png

247 ms

gintonic-social-1.jpg

gintonic-social-1.jpg

376 ms

IMG_0482-e1456229669815.jpg

IMG_0482-e1456229669815.jpg

945 ms

gin_and_tonic_91743.jpg

gin_and_tonic_91743.jpg

232 ms

12377926_184978985183121_7492233368776282622_o.jpg

12377926_184978985183121_7492233368776282622_o.jpg

542 ms

Accessibility Review

gintonic.dk accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gintonic.dk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gintonic.dk SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DA

  • Language Claimed

    DA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gintonic.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gintonic.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gintonic.dk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gin Tonic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: