7.5 sec in total
1.5 sec
5.7 sec
238 ms
Click here to check amazing GI PLAST content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about giplast.com
Gi Plast personalizza ogni profilo. Realizzazione di qualsiasi profilo su disegno del cliente, in diversi materiali come PC - PMMA - ABS - PVC, anche in coestrusione. Su specifica richiesta, possono e...
Visit giplast.comWe analyzed Giplast.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
giplast.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.168
71/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
1526 ms
234 ms
239 ms
321 ms
250 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Giplast.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Giplast.com.
Page size can be reduced by 313.3 kB (16%)
2.0 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Giplast.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 128.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GI PLAST images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 495 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giplast.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (62%)
63
24
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GI PLAST. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1526 ms
style.min.css
234 ms
styles.css
239 ms
rs6.css
321 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
250 ms
main.min.css
255 ms
ionicons.min.css
251 ms
css
30 ms
js_composer.min.css
482 ms
css
49 ms
main.min.css
507 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
335 ms
post-type.min.css
336 ms
custom.css
427 ms
media.css
403 ms
mega-menu.css
421 ms
the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css
423 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
524 ms
style.css
524 ms
jquery.min.js
593 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
540 ms
rbtools.min.js
646 ms
rs6.min.js
803 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
568 ms
css
16 ms
animate.min.css
541 ms
lightbox.min.css
542 ms
owl.min.css
602 ms
main.min.js
889 ms
index.js
611 ms
index.js
615 ms
jquery.appear.js
660 ms
main.min.js
667 ms
post-type.min.js
697 ms
complianz.min.js
702 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
810 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
809 ms
lightbox.min.js
811 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
811 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
840 ms
underscore.min.js
679 ms
vc_grid.min.js
679 ms
logo.png
125 ms
gb.png
125 ms
it.png
148 ms
de.png
195 ms
es.png
196 ms
ru.png
415 ms
home_slider.jpg
568 ms
SLIDE_02.jpg
445 ms
SLIDE_01.jpg
789 ms
SLIDE_03.jpg
790 ms
hitech-glare-control.jpg
415 ms
lastre.jpg
572 ms
tubi.jpg
566 ms
profili.jpg
611 ms
Screenshot-2024-03-05-at-18-34-31-Messe-Frankfurt-Company-Portal.png
1199 ms
Giplast_Catalogo_tecnico_2024_WEB.jpg
898 ms
TR-Testmark_9000004598_EN_CMYK_with-QR-Code-300x111.png
739 ms
congruent_pentagon.png
703 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
71 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
72 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
289 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
291 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
292 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
293 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
291 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
291 ms
icomoon-the7-font.ttf
785 ms
logo_100.png
497 ms
prev.png
503 ms
next.png
504 ms
loading.gif
583 ms
close.png
1533 ms
giplast.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
giplast.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
giplast.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giplast.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giplast.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
giplast.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GI PLAST. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: