Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

gippokrat.ru

Компания «Энергия»: увлажнители воздуха, воздухоочистители, водонагреватели

Page Load Speed

23.7 sec in total

First Response

975 ms

Resources Loaded

22 sec

Page Rendered

683 ms

gippokrat.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gippokrat content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gippokrat.ru

Мы производим климатическую и бытовую технику: воздухоочистители, увлажнители, водонагреватели, дачные летние души

Visit gippokrat.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Gippokrat.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 975 ms and then it took 22.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

gippokrat.ru performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,610 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.209

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gippokrat.ru

975 ms

kernel_main.css

267 ms

page_8ff3e4bfbfc73cb3dba5d3af0808b01a.css

289 ms

template_27ae71512de5117f0e56dbc44aa22975.css

476 ms

kernel_main.js

667 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Gippokrat.ru, 6% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Syndication.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Informer.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 576.7 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Gippokrat.ru main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 93.7 kB

  • Original 114.6 kB
  • After minification 111.4 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 39.6 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 973.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gippokrat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 218.3 kB

  • Original 291.2 kB
  • After minification 288.6 kB
  • After compression 72.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 218.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 225.2 kB

  • Original 268.8 kB
  • After minification 260.5 kB
  • After compression 43.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gippokrat.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 225.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (21%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gippokrat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gippokrat.ru accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gippokrat.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gippokrat.ru SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gippokrat.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Russian. Our system also found out that Gippokrat.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gippokrat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: