2.3 sec in total
236 ms
1.9 sec
209 ms
Welcome to gipsy.in homepage info - get ready to check Gipsy best content right away, or after learning these important things about gipsy.in
DaaZ, largest domain marketplace simple, easy & secure platform to buy domain names. Buy this Gipsy.in Domain at best price at DaaZ.
Visit gipsy.inWe analyzed Gipsy.in page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
gipsy.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value3.2 s
71/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
236 ms
237 ms
250 ms
119 ms
143 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gipsy.in, 67% (33 requests) were made to Daaz.com and 24% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (810 ms) relates to the external source Daaz.com.
Page size can be reduced by 68.8 kB (16%)
422.5 kB
353.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Gipsy.in main page is 422.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 253.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gipsy needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 24.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 730 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gipsy.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (56%)
45
20
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gipsy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gipsy.in
236 ms
gipsy.in
237 ms
gipsy.in
250 ms
style2.css
119 ms
bootstrap.min.css
143 ms
css2.css
123 ms
fonts.css
135 ms
font-awesome.css
119 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
133 ms
logo.png
223 ms
jquery.min.js
223 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
231 ms
fittext.js
237 ms
platform.js
267 ms
js
54 ms
js
83 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
55 ms
medal-1.png
266 ms
paymentgateway-logos.svg
353 ms
tooltip-icon.png
348 ms
moneyback-guarantee-icon.png
348 ms
trust-stamp.png
360 ms
money-back-img1.png
348 ms
money-back-img2.png
658 ms
money-back-img3.png
453 ms
faster-ownership-transfer-icon.png
475 ms
transper-img1.png
458 ms
transper-img2.png
456 ms
secure-payments-icon.png
467 ms
secure-payment-img1.png
561 ms
secure-payment-img2.png
565 ms
twitterX.png
571 ms
installment-agreement-w.png
810 ms
default
78 ms
sdk.js
375 ms
view
576 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
732 ms
main.js
13 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
12 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
23 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
22 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
23 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
21 ms
twk-main.js
19 ms
twk-vendor.js
26 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
29 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
36 ms
twk-runtime.js
35 ms
twk-app.js
34 ms
gipsy.in accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gipsy.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
gipsy.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gipsy.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gipsy.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gipsy.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gipsy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: