Tools & Wizards About Us
giraphicprints.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

giraphicprints.com

Screen Printing & T-Shirt Design | Giraphic Prints | Baton Rouge

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

119 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

568 ms

giraphicprints.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to giraphicprints.com homepage info - get ready to check Giraphic Prints best content right away, or after learning these important things about giraphicprints.com

At Giraphic Prints, we serve the Baton Rouge area with pride. We provide screen printing various apparel for individuals, organizations, and companies.

Visit giraphicprints.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Giraphicprints.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giraphicprints.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

giraphicprints.com

119 ms

giraphicprints.com

176 ms

foundation.css

76 ms

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

ggn3qks.js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Giraphicprints.com, 16% (8 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 12% (6 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (379 ms) belongs to the original domain Giraphicprints.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 392.0 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Giraphicprints.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 66.5 kB

  • Original 83.3 kB
  • After minification 83.2 kB
  • After compression 16.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 318.9 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Giraphic Prints needs image optimization as it can save up to 318.9 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 89.1 kB
  • After minification 88.9 kB
  • After compression 83.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 667 B

  • Original 53.5 kB
  • After minification 53.5 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giraphicprints.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (50%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giraphic Prints. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

giraphicprints.com

giraphicprints.com

119 ms

giraphicprints.com

giraphicprints.com

176 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

76 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

ggn3qks.js

ggn3qks.js

87 ms

js

js

55 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

sbi-styles.min.css

31 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

255 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

46 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

50 ms

instafeed.min.js

instafeed.min.js

49 ms

frontend-gtag.js

frontend-gtag.js

61 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

18 ms

foundation.js

foundation.js

33 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

32 ms

sbi-scripts.min.js

sbi-scripts.min.js

37 ms

classie.js

classie.js

59 ms

nav.js

nav.js

59 ms

app.js

app.js

74 ms

video-still.png

video-still.png

353 ms

giraphiclogo-white.png

giraphiclogo-white.png

79 ms

d

d

157 ms

d

d

163 ms

d

d

221 ms

d

d

165 ms

d

d

221 ms

Ostrich_Sans_Inline-regular-webfont.woff

Ostrich_Sans_Inline-regular-webfont.woff

162 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

163 ms

maxresdefault.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

253 ms

anchor.png

anchor.png

379 ms

giraffe.png

giraffe.png

252 ms

loader0.js

loader0.js

252 ms

454423228_18450516697027578_98856061095912410_nlow.jpg

454423228_18450516697027578_98856061095912410_nlow.jpg

116 ms

453498954_18449565382027578_5943750470392261510_nlow.jpg

453498954_18449565382027578_5943750470392261510_nlow.jpg

157 ms

448509779_18443951233027578_5830948310460913494_nlow.jpg

448509779_18443951233027578_5830948310460913494_nlow.jpg

118 ms

448853697_782957530625208_1802490736666303955_nlow.jpg

448853697_782957530625208_1802490736666303955_nlow.jpg

238 ms

441416419_18433759297027578_6710795859724941615_nlow.jpg

441416419_18433759297027578_6710795859724941615_nlow.jpg

118 ms

441328100_18433317658027578_520717128384973099_nlow.jpg

441328100_18433317658027578_520717128384973099_nlow.jpg

344 ms

436153215_18428619616027578_7020904840985689774_nlow.jpg

436153215_18428619616027578_7020904840985689774_nlow.jpg

120 ms

436725317_18427964098027578_4028290354242918463_nlow.jpg

436725317_18427964098027578_4028290354242918463_nlow.jpg

119 ms

d

d

115 ms

d

d

9 ms

p.gif

p.gif

32 ms

app.js

app.js

5 ms

3708-669-10-4300.js

3708-669-10-4300.js

3 ms

application2.js

application2.js

8 ms

border.png

border.png

81 ms

screen_printing-500x500.jpg

screen_printing-500x500.jpg

190 ms

Giraphic_Dune_Artwork_2023-500x500.png

Giraphic_Dune_Artwork_2023-500x500.png

81 ms

storage.html

storage.html

7 ms

storage.js

storage.js

2 ms

Accessibility Review

giraphicprints.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

giraphicprints.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

giraphicprints.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giraphicprints.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giraphicprints.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

giraphicprints.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Giraphic Prints. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: