Tools & Wizards About Us
girleek.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

girleek.net

Marre de galérer ? Formez vous en Marketing Digital avec GIRLEEK

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

330 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

747 ms

girleek.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to girleek.net homepage info - get ready to check GIRLEEK best content right away, or after learning these important things about girleek.net

Formez vous en Marketing Digital avec GIRLEEK au travers de nos webinars, Masterclass et/ou accompagnement à distance.

Visit girleek.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Girleek.net page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

girleek.net performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

girleek.net

330 ms

girleek.tech

2051 ms

style.min.css

220 ms

07a2f36176064eb2bb08ec9088b3d983.css

157 ms

css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Girleek.net, 43% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 38% (14 requests) were made to Girleek.tech. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Girleek.tech.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

849.9 kB

After Optimization

729.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Girleek.net main page is 849.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 386.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 108.7 kB

  • Original 129.3 kB
  • After minification 127.0 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 190.0 kB
  • After minification 186.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GIRLEEK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 386.6 kB
  • After minification 386.6 kB
  • After compression 379.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 266 B

  • Original 144.0 kB
  • After minification 144.0 kB
  • After compression 143.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Girleek.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (82%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GIRLEEK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

girleek.net

girleek.net

330 ms

girleek.tech

girleek.tech

2051 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

220 ms

07a2f36176064eb2bb08ec9088b3d983.css

07a2f36176064eb2bb08ec9088b3d983.css

157 ms

css

css

35 ms

17f63c8a6cd096217b4f257748d1c21a.css

17f63c8a6cd096217b4f257748d1c21a.css

412 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

628 ms

ea9edb18c10d9b4aa32004c4bf6c91c7.js

ea9edb18c10d9b4aa32004c4bf6c91c7.js

321 ms

eef510d032cac310db5b4d5c3e9baf0b.js

eef510d032cac310db5b4d5c3e9baf0b.js

274 ms

init.js

init.js

389 ms

js

js

57 ms

ausha-player.js

ausha-player.js

113 ms

84b8e94a14fe21202780bf393c2bf4a2.js

84b8e94a14fe21202780bf393c2bf4a2.js

313 ms

b9c2bb55e45e9c7c9a37dfcc396797a1.js

b9c2bb55e45e9c7c9a37dfcc396797a1.js

813 ms

dd1cbad1e99448b1189f92a0fd5d2b16.js

dd1cbad1e99448b1189f92a0fd5d2b16.js

485 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

399 ms

ade47a5e800db374248380a15.js

ade47a5e800db374248380a15.js

193 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

72 ms

Logo_girleek_stickers.png

Logo_girleek_stickers.png

259 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

96 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

225 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

226 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZg.ttf

275 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZg.ttf

275 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

275 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

275 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

276 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

277 ms

uncode-icons.woff

uncode-icons.woff

671 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE-_F.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE-_F.ttf

218 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E-_F.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E-_F.ttf

126 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4jE-_F.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4jE-_F.ttf

125 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk7PFO_F.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk7PFO_F.ttf

125 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FO_F.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk79FO_F.ttf

125 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk6jFO_F.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk6jFO_F.ttf

215 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59FO_F.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59FO_F.ttf

468 ms

embed.js

embed.js

207 ms

Accessibility Review

girleek.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

girleek.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

girleek.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Girleek.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Girleek.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

girleek.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GIRLEEK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: