Tools & Wizards About Us
gispp.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

gispp.org

GISPP - Global Information Security Society Of Pakistani Professionals

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

gispp.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gispp.org homepage info - get ready to check GISPP best content right away, or after learning these important things about gispp.org

GISPP is a Community of Pakistani Information Security professionals working worldwide.Its Key focus areas are Knowledge Sharing , Helping in Jobs as well as Capacity building . Check out our Guides a...

Visit gispp.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Gispp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gispp.org performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,400 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gispp.org

1418 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

20 ms

style.min.css

29 ms

styles.css

33 ms

font-awesome.min.css

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Gispp.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Gispp.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 389.2 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gispp.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 585.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 140.5 kB

  • Original 166.0 kB
  • After minification 166.0 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 369.4 kB
  • After minification 364.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GISPP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 154.4 kB

  • Original 585.6 kB
  • After minification 585.6 kB
  • After compression 431.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.4 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 89.6 kB

  • Original 341.6 kB
  • After minification 341.6 kB
  • After compression 252.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gispp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 80 (87%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GISPP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gispp.org

gispp.org

1418 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

20 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

29 ms

styles.css

styles.css

33 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

119 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

rgs.css

rgs.css

35 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

44 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

96 ms

portfolio.css

portfolio.css

395 ms

iconsmind.css

iconsmind.css

388 ms

skin-material.css

skin-material.css

103 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

108 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

414 ms

um-fonticons-ii.css

um-fonticons-ii.css

108 ms

um-fonticons-fa.css

um-fonticons-fa.css

111 ms

select2.css

select2.css

113 ms

um-crop.css

um-crop.css

116 ms

um-modal.css

um-modal.css

117 ms

um-styles.css

um-styles.css

118 ms

um-profile.css

um-profile.css

119 ms

um-account.css

um-account.css

120 ms

um-misc.css

um-misc.css

121 ms

um-fileupload.css

um-fileupload.css

178 ms

default.css

default.css

121 ms

default.date.css

default.date.css

121 ms

default.time.css

default.time.css

125 ms

um-raty.css

um-raty.css

127 ms

simplebar.css

simplebar.css

139 ms

um-tipsy.css

um-tipsy.css

139 ms

um-responsive.css

um-responsive.css

149 ms

um-old-default.css

um-old-default.css

149 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

162 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

161 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

173 ms

js

js

103 ms

um-gdpr.min.js

um-gdpr.min.js

443 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

181 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

173 ms

priority.js

priority.js

178 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

197 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

184 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

189 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

148 ms

init.js

init.js

144 ms

flickity.min.js

flickity.min.js

626 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

154 ms

isotope.min.js

isotope.min.js

162 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

175 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

184 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

212 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

223 ms

um-crop.min.js

um-crop.min.js

232 ms

um-modal.min.js

um-modal.min.js

241 ms

um-jquery-form.min.js

um-jquery-form.min.js

250 ms

um-fileupload.min.js

um-fileupload.min.js

262 ms

picker.js

picker.js

273 ms

picker.date.js

picker.date.js

272 ms

picker.time.js

picker.time.js

279 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

275 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

278 ms

um-raty.min.js

um-raty.min.js

306 ms

um-tipsy.min.js

um-tipsy.min.js

307 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

296 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

297 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

284 ms

simplebar.min.js

simplebar.min.js

327 ms

um-functions.min.js

um-functions.min.js

316 ms

um-responsive.min.js

um-responsive.min.js

316 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

301 ms

um-conditional.min.js

um-conditional.min.js

299 ms

um-scripts.min.js

um-scripts.min.js

291 ms

um-profile.min.js

um-profile.min.js

280 ms

um-account.min.js

um-account.min.js

271 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

268 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

296 ms

gisp-logo.png

gisp-logo.png

45 ms

Banner-Browser-in-Browser-Attack-e1654018484561.png

Banner-Browser-in-Browser-Attack-e1654018484561.png

433 ms

Banner-img.png

Banner-img.png

44 ms

Banner.png

Banner.png

517 ms

Email-attacks-types.jpg

Email-attacks-types.jpg

420 ms

gispp.org

gispp.org

851 ms

session1.jpg

session1.jpg

60 ms

portfolio-arrows.png

portfolio-arrows.png

60 ms

js

js

228 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

224 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

217 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

343 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

219 ms

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

OpenSansBold-webfont.woff

600 ms

iconsmind.ttf

iconsmind.ttf

1249 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

658 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

363 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

888 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

467 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

654 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

798 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

718 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

823 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

524 ms

Accessibility Review

gispp.org accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gispp.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

gispp.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gispp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gispp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gispp.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GISPP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: