6 sec in total
102 ms
5.3 sec
554 ms
Welcome to gisstec.com homepage info - get ready to check Gisstec best content right away, or after learning these important things about gisstec.com
Broaching Tools: Open keyway, square, hexagon and spline with Gisstec Broaching & Slotting Tools. Angle Heads: 90º, Slim, Tilting and Double Angle Heads. Add an axis to your machining center.
Visit gisstec.comWe analyzed Gisstec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
gisstec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
31/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value550 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
102 ms
2515 ms
59 ms
233 ms
279 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Gisstec.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Gisstec.de and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Gisstec.com.
Page size can be reduced by 133.3 kB (12%)
1.1 MB
958.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Gisstec.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 643.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 101.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gisstec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 290 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 314 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gisstec.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (73%)
80
22
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gisstec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gisstec.com
102 ms
gisstec.com
2515 ms
js
59 ms
style.min.css
233 ms
styles.css
279 ms
crellyslider.min.css
262 ms
style.css
263 ms
font-awesome.min.css
238 ms
ionicons.css
412 ms
elementor.css
443 ms
animate.css
471 ms
extras.css
462 ms
style.css
465 ms
39fe2195cd7e7c5d5232ccef15d51873.css
476 ms
e9a675acb0047b7a144a634b821c8655.css
645 ms
b0bc3631cf298e4d2523ba97d697c376.css
638 ms
5b161c6f6d96ac92a9219d6eeadcffad.css
660 ms
front.min.css
698 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
486 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
680 ms
frontend.min.css
735 ms
swiper.min.css
836 ms
all.min.css
879 ms
v4-shims.min.css
858 ms
global.css
885 ms
post-438.css
709 ms
google-fonts-1.css
936 ms
fontawesome.min.css
762 ms
solid.min.css
793 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
1043 ms
jquery.min.js
1035 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1055 ms
core.min.js
1098 ms
jquery.crellyslider.min.js
1090 ms
front.min.js
1144 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1238 ms
js
70 ms
animations.min.css
902 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
1305 ms
email-decode.min.js
904 ms
index.js
1259 ms
index.js
1254 ms
frontend.js
1246 ms
navigation.js
1241 ms
main.js
1230 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1167 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1050 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1031 ms
waypoints.min.js
1058 ms
swiper.min.js
1090 ms
share-link.min.js
1252 ms
dialog.min.js
1049 ms
frontend.min.js
1088 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1080 ms
underscore.min.js
1116 ms
wp-util.min.js
1112 ms
wpforms.min.js
1115 ms
frontend.min.js
1028 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
1187 ms
mailcheck.min.js
1246 ms
punycode.min.js
1177 ms
utils.min.js
1174 ms
bosch-logo.jpg
469 ms
Gisstec-GmbH-Logo.gif
753 ms
Keyway-Broaching-Slotting-Gisstec.jpg
773 ms
Gisstec-AMB-2024-Signatur-v3.png
840 ms
Turning-and-milling-tools-Gisstec-ql8erh5nsuakw300z3pv2s0exzq36ih5tjlbd0mt42.jpg
951 ms
Angle-Head-Gisstec-2.jpg
943 ms
Gisstec-PSC-Toolholders.jpg
975 ms
Spline-Broaching-Slotting-Sample-2-Gisstec.jpg
1015 ms
Hexagon-Broaching-Slotting-Sample-Gisstec.jpg
1042 ms
Spline-Broaching-Slotting-Sample-Gisstec.jpg
1045 ms
arcelor-mittal-logo.jpg
663 ms
federalmogul-logo.jpg
669 ms
fiat-logo-1.jpg
680 ms
lufthansa-technik-logo.jpg
684 ms
gates-logo-1.jpg
726 ms
lisi-aerospace-logo.jpg
710 ms
ford-logo.jpg
911 ms
mahle-logo.jpg
863 ms
Gisstec-Blog.png
912 ms
cropped-favicon-192x192.png
886 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1056 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1116 ms
ionicons.ttf
1004 ms
overpass-light.woff
1131 ms
overpass-extralight.woff
1076 ms
overpass-regular.woff
1076 ms
eicons.woff
1311 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1274 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1216 ms
gisstec.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gisstec.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gisstec.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gisstec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gisstec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gisstec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gisstec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: