Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

giveter.com

Giveter

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

443 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

giveter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to giveter.com homepage info - get ready to check Giveter best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about giveter.com

Find the perfect gifts for yourself, your family, your friends: on-trends, personalization, funny quotes, cool art.

Visit giveter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Giveter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 443 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giveter.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,050 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

giveter.com

443 ms

www.giveter.com

697 ms

FXFSkBdBbtfCNVDSKSDBpwJJ.css

1023 ms

igFySIwniEmXNXfJHtjUGAJJ.js

1528 ms

ga.js

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Giveter.com, 50% (60 requests) were made to Givtir.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Givtir.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 591.3 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Giveter.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 129.4 kB

  • Original 145.4 kB
  • After minification 80.8 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 64.6 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 71.1 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Giveter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 390.8 kB

  • Original 563.0 kB
  • After minification 563.0 kB
  • After compression 172.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 390.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (8%)

Requests Now

119

After Optimization

109

The browser has sent 119 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giveter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

giveter.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

giveter.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

giveter.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giveter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giveter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Giveter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: