15.4 sec in total
3 sec
11.1 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to gizmac.com homepage info - get ready to check Gizmac best content right away, or after learning these important things about gizmac.com
Neste artigo, mergulharemos no fascinante mundo do crochê com fio de malha, explorando a união entre criatividade e sustentabilidade que permeia essa prática. O crochê é uma arte que encanta e inspira...
Visit gizmac.comWe analyzed Gizmac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 12.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
gizmac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
3041 ms
245 ms
368 ms
376 ms
503 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Gizmac.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gizmac.com.
Page size can be reduced by 60.0 kB (36%)
168.1 kB
108.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gizmac.com main page is 168.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 79.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 471 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gizmac needs image optimization as it can save up to 471 B or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 714 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gizmac.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (78%)
18
4
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gizmac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gizmac.com
3041 ms
style.min.css
245 ms
styles.css
368 ms
style.css
376 ms
jquery.min.js
503 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
381 ms
css
30 ms
css
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
267 ms
fancybox.css
260 ms
fancybox.js
373 ms
resmenu.js
380 ms
fittext.js
383 ms
index.js
488 ms
index.js
488 ms
automatic-links.js
500 ms
jquery.cookie.js
505 ms
75 ms
gizmac.com
1593 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
30 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
78 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
75 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
78 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
77 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
369 ms
gizmac.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
gizmac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gizmac.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gizmac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Portuguese. Our system also found out that Gizmac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gizmac.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: