4 sec in total
769 ms
2.3 sec
847 ms
Visit gjg.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date GJG content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gjg.co.uk
GJG Electronics | Bespoke Engineering | Electronics | Electrical | Mechanical | Software | Fabrication
Visit gjg.co.ukWe analyzed Gjg.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 769 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
gjg.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value1
2/100
15%
Value5.3 s
73/100
10%
769 ms
86 ms
236 ms
228 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gjg.co.uk and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (769 ms) belongs to the original domain Gjg.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 175.7 kB (2%)
7.9 MB
7.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Gjg.co.uk main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GJG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gjg.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 19% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (63%)
62
23
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GJG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gjg.co.uk
769 ms
rokbox.css
86 ms
bootstrap.css
236 ms
master-965a51a5233eaff372cd2c705f9f69b3.css
228 ms
master-gecko.css
154 ms
demo-965a51a5233eaff372cd2c705f9f69b3.css
157 ms
mediaqueries.css
156 ms
grid-flexbox-responsive.css
163 ms
menu-dropdown-direction.css
241 ms
animate.css
243 ms
menu.css
241 ms
rt_myriad-custom.css
245 ms
slideshow3.css
306 ms
apollo.css
306 ms
fullslideshow.css
310 ms
jquery.min.js
390 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
315 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
316 ms
caption.js
384 ms
mootools-core.js
385 ms
core.js
387 ms
mootools-more.js
547 ms
rokbox.js
469 ms
chart.js
463 ms
wow.js
462 ms
wow-init.js
463 ms
gantry-totop.js
467 ms
browser-engines.js
543 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
544 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
541 ms
sidemenu.js
576 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
544 ms
mootools-mobile.js
627 ms
rokmediaqueries.js
629 ms
roksprocket.js
630 ms
moofx.js
632 ms
features.js
628 ms
slideshow3.js
547 ms
roksprocket.request.js
558 ms
strips.js
556 ms
strips-speeds.js
557 ms
fullslideshow.js
550 ms
logo.png
85 ms
20140401_193412.jpg
475 ms
drill-500x300px.png
307 ms
Software.jpg
384 ms
Main_500x300px.jpg
107 ms
nixie_clock_in_tube.JPG
106 ms
control_panel_Blurred-500x300px.png
313 ms
PTL02_500x300px.jpg
237 ms
code-82_800x1000px.png
546 ms
board-800x1000px.png
542 ms
electrical-800x1000px.png
536 ms
clock-800x1000px.png
625 ms
compressor-800x1000px.jpg
538 ms
drawing_blurred_dark-800x600px.png
557 ms
motor_control_panel-285x190px.jpg
613 ms
technical-285x190px.jpg
615 ms
metal-285x190px.jpg
618 ms
source-285x190px.jpg
624 ms
bg.jpg
635 ms
clock-800x600px.png
694 ms
gjglogo1_140x30_mono.png
692 ms
lora-regular-webfont.woff
615 ms
lora-bold-webfont.woff
642 ms
lato-bold-webfont.woff
643 ms
lato-regular-webfont.woff
643 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
693 ms
lato-black-webfont.woff
692 ms
gjg.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gjg.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gjg.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gjg.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gjg.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gjg.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GJG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: