Tools & Wizards About Us
gl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

gl.com

GL Communications Inc - Comprehensive Telecom Test solutions

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

277 ms

gl.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gl.com homepage info - get ready to check GL best content for Iran right away, or after learning these important things about gl.com

GL Communications Inc is a global provider of test and measurement solutions and works with major telecom equipment vendors, service providers, and system integrators to meet today's testing requireme...

Visit gl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gl.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,920 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.275

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gl.com

134 ms

www.gl.com

239 ms

bootstrap.min.css

588 ms

font-awesome.min.css

250 ms

solid-menu.min.css

267 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Gl.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Eastprodcdn.azureedge.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Gl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 266.7 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gl.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 852.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 71.5 kB
  • After minification 54.6 kB
  • After compression 10.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.8 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 852.0 kB
  • After minification 837.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 66.8 kB

  • Original 280.0 kB
  • After minification 279.8 kB
  • After compression 213.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.8 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 124.2 kB

  • Original 197.7 kB
  • After minification 197.5 kB
  • After compression 73.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (46%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gl.com

gl.com

134 ms

www.gl.com

www.gl.com

239 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

588 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

250 ms

solid-menu.min.css

solid-menu.min.css

267 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

288 ms

responsive.min.css

responsive.min.css

251 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

245 ms

gl-brand-color.min.css

gl-brand-color.min.css

429 ms

venobox.min.css

venobox.min.css

456 ms

menu.js

menu.js

1018 ms

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

jquery-3.1.1.min.js

438 ms

jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js

jquery-migrate-3.0.0.min.js

349 ms

script-ajax.min.js

script-ajax.min.js

398 ms

modernizrr.min.js

modernizrr.min.js

1926 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1980 ms

solid-menu.min.js

solid-menu.min.js

498 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

516 ms

venobox.min.js

venobox.min.js

567 ms

nivo-lightbox.min.js

nivo-lightbox.min.js

1979 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2767 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

766 ms

jquery.appear.min.js

jquery.appear.min.js

1037 ms

count-to.min.js

count-to.min.js

2969 ms

jquery.textillate.min.js

jquery.textillate.min.js

2963 ms

jquery.lettering.min.js

jquery.lettering.min.js

2965 ms

css

css

31 ms

css

css

48 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

110 ms

packetexpert-100g.jpg

packetexpert-100g.jpg

1502 ms

xs-packetexpert-100g.jpg

xs-packetexpert-100g.jpg

1902 ms

vMobile.jpg

vMobile.jpg

1564 ms

xs-vMobile.jpg

xs-vMobile.jpg

2370 ms

bg-3.jpg

bg-3.jpg

3273 ms

xs-air-traffic-management.jpg

xs-air-traffic-management.jpg

3416 ms

bg-2.jpg

bg-2.jpg

2802 ms

xs-consulting-services.jpg

xs-consulting-services.jpg

2439 ms

bg-1.jpg

bg-1.jpg

2647 ms

xs-telecom-test-solutions.jpg

xs-telecom-test-solutions.jpg

2431 ms

index-products.jpg

index-products.jpg

2497 ms

index-consulting.jpg

index-consulting.jpg

3419 ms

index-support.jpg

index-support.jpg

2559 ms

gloverview.jpg

gloverview.jpg

2932 ms

webinar-high-speed-capture-analysis-voip-wireless-protocols-over-ip-may-2024.jpg

webinar-high-speed-capture-analysis-voip-wireless-protocols-over-ip-may-2024.jpg

2786 ms

emergency-services-whitepaper-download.jpg

emergency-services-whitepaper-download.jpg

3445 ms

index-harware-packetexpert-100g-tn.jpg

index-harware-packetexpert-100g-tn.jpg

2902 ms

index-harware-packetscan-hd-tn.jpg

index-harware-packetscan-hd-tn.jpg

3393 ms

index-harware-maps-hd-tn.jpg

index-harware-maps-hd-tn.jpg

3027 ms

index-harware-mtop-vquad-dual-uta-hd-tn.jpg

index-harware-mtop-vquad-dual-uta-hd-tn.jpg

3493 ms

index-harware-mtop-ethernet-optical-tdm-tn.jpg

index-harware-mtop-ethernet-optical-tdm-tn.jpg

3321 ms

index-harware-mtop-datacom-tn.jpg

index-harware-mtop-datacom-tn.jpg

3386 ms

index-harware-packetexpert-10g-tn.jpg

index-harware-packetexpert-10g-tn.jpg

3490 ms

font

font

14 ms

font

font

20 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3553 ms

js

js

59 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

24 ms

bat.js

bat.js

40 ms

destination

destination

234 ms

destination

destination

188 ms

dqifz6et8z

dqifz6et8z

183 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

collect

collect

214 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

86 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

37 ms

header.html

header.html

3153 ms

footer.html

footer.html

1209 ms

globals.js

globals.js

29 ms

velaro.inline.js

velaro.inline.js

69 ms

velaro.inline.5e9277fb.js

velaro.inline.5e9277fb.js

5 ms

60 ms

velaro.inline.min.css

velaro.inline.min.css

5 ms

58 ms

31 ms

inlinechat.min.css

inlinechat.min.css

4 ms

inlinechat.css

inlinechat.css

9 ms

91 ms

12 ms

x.svg

x.svg

69 ms

gl-communications-inc-logo.png

gl-communications-inc-logo.png

55 ms

x1.svg

x1.svg

52 ms

flags-usa.png

flags-usa.png

148 ms

flags-india.png

flags-india.png

656 ms

flags-china.png

flags-china.png

49 ms

gl-logo-footer.png

gl-logo-footer.png

720 ms

map.png

map.png

155 ms

c.gif

c.gif

6 ms

Accessibility Review

gl.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gl.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gl.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gl.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: