Tools & Wizards About Us
glamattack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

glamattack.com

Eyeliners - Liquid, Gel & Pencil Liners - Maybelline

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

glamattack.com screenshot

About Website

Visit glamattack.com now to see the best up-to-date Glamattack content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glamattack.com

Discover our best long-lasting eyeliners by Maybelline. From gel to liquid to pencil, you can create perfect eye makeup looks with our waterproof eyeliners.

Visit glamattack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glamattack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glamattack.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value36,230 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.128

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value50.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glamattack.com

36 ms

eyeliner

1274 ms

optimize.js

86 ms

site.min.js

234 ms

maybelline_v2.css

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Glamattack.com, 84% (26 requests) were made to Maybelline.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googleoptimize.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Maybelline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 208.9 kB (47%)

Content Size

448.2 kB

After Optimization

239.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glamattack.com main page is 448.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 235.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 151.0 kB

  • Original 178.7 kB
  • After minification 131.0 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.7 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 151.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1 B

  • Original 18.4 kB
  • After minification 18.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glamattack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 15.3 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

  • Original 235.7 kB
  • After minification 235.7 kB
  • After compression 182.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glamattack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glamattack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glamattack.com

glamattack.com

36 ms

eyeliner

eyeliner

1274 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

86 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

234 ms

maybelline_v2.css

maybelline_v2.css

107 ms

bundle.css

bundle.css

58 ms

localize.min.css

localize.min.css

49 ms

bv.js

bv.js

233 ms

VisitorIdentification.js

VisitorIdentification.js

73 ms

evergage.min.js

evergage.min.js

234 ms

gtmTagging.min.js

gtmTagging.min.js

69 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

289 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

226 ms

messages.js

messages.js

223 ms

localize.min.js

localize.min.js

221 ms

bvhostedtagging.js

bvhostedtagging.js

222 ms

logo_v3.png

logo_v3.png

191 ms

Placeholder_1320x250

Placeholder_1320x250

188 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

187 ms

bot-sm.png

bot-sm.png

186 ms

hamburger_close.png

hamburger_close.png

128 ms

heart_pink_unselected.png

heart_pink_unselected.png

123 ms

heart_black_unselected.png

heart_black_unselected.png

123 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

124 ms

black_arrow.png

black_arrow.png

125 ms

08edde9d-c27b-4731-a27f-d6cd9b01cd06.woff

08edde9d-c27b-4731-a27f-d6cd9b01cd06.woff

260 ms

bc3be26e-0e16-4127-a87d-eb76bb903f4c.woff

bc3be26e-0e16-4127-a87d-eb76bb903f4c.woff

257 ms

Maybelline-icons.woff

Maybelline-icons.woff

258 ms

5e8d493c-be01-44b9-962e-504a5cf10dd8.woff

5e8d493c-be01-44b9-962e-504a5cf10dd8.woff

256 ms

ff4ce601-b504-4b47-9d8d-3b3062c2034e.woff

ff4ce601-b504-4b47-9d8d-3b3062c2034e.woff

257 ms

invisible.js

invisible.js

117 ms

Accessibility Review

glamattack.com accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glamattack.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

glamattack.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glamattack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glamattack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glamattack.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Glamattack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: