Access glambyglo.net.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.5 s

2/100

10%

glambyglo.net

362 ms

css

26 ms

bootstrap.css

225 ms

style.css

325 ms

dark.css

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Glambyglo.net, 14% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) belongs to the original domain Glambyglo.net.

Content Size

391.3 kB

After Optimization

200.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Glambyglo.net main page is 391.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 130.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 47.2 kB

Original 54.4 kB
After minification 47.2 kB
After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 93.1 kB

Original 130.6 kB
After minification 37.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Glambyglo needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.1 kB or 71% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

Original 94.8 kB
After minification 94.8 kB
After compression 90.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 45.9 kB

Original 111.5 kB
After minification 111.5 kB
After compression 65.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glambyglo.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.9 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glambyglo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

N/A
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glambyglo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Glambyglo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glambyglo.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glambyglo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

glambyglo.net

css

bootstrap.css

style.css

dark.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

glambyglo.net

css

bootstrap.css

style.css

dark.css

font-icons.css

animate.css

magnific-popup.css

responsive.css

settings.css

layers.css

navigation.css

embed.js

jquery.js

plugins.js

functions.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

logo.png

logo@2x.png

glam.jpg

abstract.png

tag.png

snatched.jpg

abstract2.png

bag3.jpg

girl1.jpg

teeth.jpg

hair.jpg

glam2.jpg

dotted.png

1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

footer-widget-logo.png